NEW TOPIC: bylaw discussion |
![]() ![]() |
NEW TOPIC: bylaw discussion |
| *Statues/Shadows* |
Aug 31 2006, 03:37 PM
Post
#26
|
|
Guest |
We'd already established that I was correct. To restate that would have been redundant. My lack of tactfulness does not make it much less true that he's a dumbass, either.
|
|
|
|
| *digital.fragrance* |
Aug 31 2006, 03:39 PM
Post
#27
|
|
Guest |
Yes, you were correct, but please don't call people names... please...? |
|
|
|
| *Statues/Shadows* |
Aug 31 2006, 03:40 PM
Post
#28
|
|
Guest |
I will try to use discression so long as it's not just an undeniable truth :)
|
|
|
|
| *digital.fragrance* |
Aug 31 2006, 03:42 PM
Post
#29
|
|
Guest |
|
|
|
|
| *I Shot JFK* |
Aug 31 2006, 03:43 PM
Post
#30
|
|
Guest |
deniability is really only necessary if you wish to deny something.
and it is my BELIEF that he should shu tup. you cant stop me stating my BELIEFS. You cannot silence me! beliefist. |
|
|
|
| *digital.fragrance* |
Aug 31 2006, 03:44 PM
Post
#31
|
|
Guest |
James, I don't think I could even try...
|
|
|
|
| *Statues/Shadows* |
Aug 31 2006, 03:46 PM
Post
#32
|
|
Guest |
Well you could try, you'd just assuredly fail
|
|
|
|
| *digital.fragrance* |
Aug 31 2006, 03:47 PM
Post
#33
|
|
Guest |
^ Exactly
I wouldn't even dream about it. |
|
|
|
| *I Shot JFK* |
Aug 31 2006, 03:49 PM
Post
#34
|
|
Guest |
Lol.
<3. Well, I dont pretend like i'll STOP, becaus ethat would be a complete lie. but i promise to feel REALLY bad about it. |
|
|
|
| *Statues/Shadows* |
Aug 31 2006, 03:49 PM
Post
#35
|
|
Guest |
You don't enjoy arguing in circles for over an hour about absolutely nothing?
I'll consider stopping, but most likely won't feel bad about it in the least. It that worse? |
|
|
|
| *digital.fragrance* |
Aug 31 2006, 03:52 PM
Post
#36
|
|
Guest |
|
|
|
|
![]() ![]() |