Passion of the christ |
Debate Rules
Here are the general forum rules that you must follow before you start any debate topics. Please make sure you've read and followed all directions.
- Topics are not to bash others.
- Immature behaviors/comments will not be tolerated.
- Please remember, not everyone thinks like you. People have different ways of thinking and different perspectives. Let's respect each other's thoughts and responses.
- PLEASE, search before making new topics--especially popular topics like "God" and "Abortion" etc.
- PLEASE, read through the thread or at least a couple pages before posting. We have to maintain a certain level of maturity in here.
  |
 May 25 2004, 10:23 PM
Post
#1
|
|
 Master Debater  Group: Member Posts: 1,066 Joined: May 2004 Member No: 15,719  |
Alright, so this movie's heyday may have passed, but the thought just came to be. Why was "The Passion of the Christ" considered such a good movie? Was it because it revolved around Jesus's life and such?
Although i'm sure Jesus' life and death is the epitome of intresting, the movie honestly was not that great. It performed a quick overview of Jesus' life, wasn't exactly beatifully written or acted, and I just wasn't feeling the character relationships. The only scene that stands out is the "Jesus getting beat" scene which took the whole concept of showing Jesus' sacrafice and pain one step too far. Every other scene felt forced, only there because a Jesus film has gotta have it. You never did get a deeper view into who Jesus really was. I think this film only did so well because it was a monopoly when it comes to modern Jesus films. You'd think our "savior's" story would be more deserving of a better movie, but if this is all people are givin they'll take it and go as far as to call it "good". Note to mods/admins: Before you let that overwhelming urge to move this to "entertainment" because its a movie, keep in mind that this topic strives to serve as a discussion on why the "The Passion of the Christ" should/shouldn't be considered a good movie. |
|
|
|
|
May 25 2004, 10:54 PM
Post
#2
|
|
 Quand j'étais jeune... Group: Staff Alumni Posts: 6,826 Joined: Jan 2004 Member No: 1,272 |
Actually, I thought it was good, but it could've been better.
I don't know... it seemed... kind of boring... Sorry to those who liked the movie. |
|
|
|
|
May 26 2004, 12:59 AM
Post
#3
|
|
 Wow it's been a long time!! Group: Member Posts: 1,672 Joined: Mar 2004 Member No: 8,954 |
i hated it, it wasnt anti semetic (coming from a girl who's boyfriend is jewish,) but it was definetly boring, and there was no point. i felt like mel gibson was trying to prove some underlying point. and it was GROSS. seriously i think that they didn't need to do that, the movie as a movie had no point, and didn't seem very religiously important, but I guess other people viewed it as so, so whatever!
|
|
|
|
| *CEP* |
May 26 2004, 02:15 AM
Post
#4
|
|
Guest |
It was a 2 hour flick about Jesus gettin' his ass kicked.
Enough said. Didn't do sh*t to me or my beliefs.  - Chinkieeyedpnoi |
|
|
|
|
May 26 2004, 06:11 AM
Post
#5
|
|
 i'm susan Group: Official Member Posts: 13,875 Joined: Feb 2004 Member No: 5,029 |
mel gibson did an awesome job to that movie and im glad that he made that movie and of course all christians are happy about to see that so they can see how Jesus did for us... and how he went through. that movie was awesome, even tho there was so much gore. i get to see how much pain he went through... sigh i felt bad wen they choose over the prisoner instead of Jesus...it's so weird wat did the prisoner do? he didnt do any good things...all he did was bad things... and for like Jesus, he saved so many ppls and cured them... u knoe if they werent cured the first place....one of u guys wouldnt be here in this earth by now.
|
|
|
|
|
May 26 2004, 06:14 AM
Post
#6
|
|
 Senior Member Group: Member Posts: 811 Joined: Apr 2004 Member No: 11,377 |
QUOTE(TBoltzbabe @ May 26 2004, 12:59 AM) i hated it, it wasnt anti semetic (coming from a girl who's boyfriend is jewish,) but it was definetly boring, and there was no point. i felt like mel gibson was trying to prove some underlying point. and it was GROSS. seriously i think that they didn't need to do that, the movie as a movie had no point, and didn't seem very religiously important, but I guess other people viewed it as so, so whatever! nothing was anti-semistic....JESUS WAS A JEW!!! i thought it was really gud...n i didnt think they took it "to the next level" that is really what He went through...actually He went through more...for longer...i thought it was gud..n thats not just cuz im Christian b/c i went with a non-Christian n all of the non-Christian ppl i know that saw it said it was really gud...they just didnt get a lot of it...maybe thats y ya'll think its boring.... |
|
|
|
|
May 26 2004, 06:32 AM
Post
#7
|
|
|
Senior Member Group: Member Posts: 1,245 Joined: May 2004 Member No: 17,033 |
QUOTE(chinkieeyedpnoi @ May 26 2004, 2:15 AM) It was a 2 hour flick about Jesus gettin' his ass kicked. Enough said. Didn't do sh*t to me or my beliefs. - Chinkieeyedpnoi same here jose and on top of that they speak in like hebrew? and you have to read the subtitles soo boring...*YAWN* 
|
|
|
|
|
May 26 2004, 09:51 AM
Post
#8
|
|
|
Master Debater Group: Member Posts: 1,066 Joined: May 2004 Member No: 15,719 |
Alright, so the opposing argument is that this film clearly represents what Jesus went through. Don't you think the story telling was a bit shoddy though?
And saying this film is bad doesn't make you the antichrist. It just makes you anti-crazy mel gibson directing. |
|
|
|
|
May 26 2004, 08:00 PM
Post
#9
|
|
|
Group: Posts: 0 Joined: -- Member No: 0 |
QUOTE(WildGriffin @ May 25 2004, 11:23 PM) Alright, so this movie's heyday may have passed, but the thought just came to be. Why was "The Passion of the Christ" considered such a good movie? Was it because it revolved around Jesus's life and such? Although i'm sure Jesus' life and death is the epitome of intresting, the movie honestly was not that great. It performed a quick overview of Jesus' life, wasn't exactly beatifully written or acted, and I just wasn't feeling the character relationships. The only scene that stands out is the "Jesus getting beat" scene which took the whole concept of showing Jesus' sacrafice and pain one step too far. Every other scene felt forced, only there because a Jesus film has gotta have it. You never did get a deeper view into who Jesus really was. I think this film only did so well because it was a monopoly when it comes to modern Jesus films. You'd think our "savior's" story would be more deserving of a better movie, but if this is all people are givin they'll take it and go as far as to call it "good". Note to mods/admins: Before you let that overwhelming urge to move this to "entertainment" because its a movie, keep in mind that this topic strives to serve as a discussion on why the "The Passion of the Christ" should/shouldn't be considered a good movie. i think that may have been it, but i dont know. i didnt see it. it goes agianst my religion so i probably wouldnt have enjoyed it if it had been the best movie ever! |
|
|
|
|
May 26 2004, 08:02 PM
Post
#10
|
|
|
Group: Posts: 0 Joined: -- Member No: 0 |
QUOTE(anqel_r0h @ May 26 2004, 7:11 AM) mel gibson did an awesome job to that movie and im glad that he made that movie and of course all christians are happy about to see that so they can see how Jesus did for us... and how he went through. that movie was awesome, even tho there was so much gore. i get to see how much pain he went through... sigh i felt bad wen they choose over the prisoner instead of Jesus...it's so weird wat did the prisoner do? he didnt do any good things...all he did was bad things... and for like Jesus, he saved so many ppls and cured them... u knoe if they werent cured the first place....one of u guys wouldnt be here in this earth by now. ah no. please dont try and force your christian beliefs on people. |
|
|
|
|
May 26 2004, 08:08 PM
Post
#11
|
|
 [[one piece :D Group: Member Posts: 2,722 Joined: Jan 2004 Member No: 795 |
Yup, Jesus life is not beautiful. That movie is really bloody huh? In the bible said Jesus use his own blood to safe us. If there is no blood how to He safe us?
|
|
|
|
|
May 26 2004, 08:09 PM
Post
#12
|
|
|
[[one piece :D Group: Member Posts: 2,722 Joined: Jan 2004 Member No: 795 |
QUOTE(jewishbabeygirl87 @ May 26 2004, 6:02 PM) ah no. please dont try and force your christian beliefs on people. This forum is called debate. We can argue and talk whatever it is, as long it's rated PG-13. 
|
|
|
|
|
May 26 2004, 09:22 PM
Post
#13
|
|
 3,565, you n00bs ain't got nothin' on me. Group: Official Member Posts: 3,761 Joined: Feb 2004 Member No: 3,565 |
QUOTE(jewishbabeygirl87 @ May 26 2004, 8:02 PM) ah no. please dont try and force your christian beliefs on people. She's only putting in her thoughts on it. And I remember, it was you arguing fanatically for a Jewish side of a debate. I didn't see it, but the religion that pulsed deep in it clearly affected many people.. |
|
|
|
|
May 26 2004, 10:33 PM
Post
#14
|
|
 Don't wake ghostie. Group: Official Member Posts: 3,546 Joined: Jan 2004 Member No: 2,405 |
i haven't seen it, i protested against it because i don't believe in commercializing any religion especially mine to sell money and make a profit over jesus christ death, it's almost as bad as going to his real death and paying to see it for enntertainment. you might as well have been gambling for his clothing right under his feet. oh and yeah, it was supposed to be gross.. duh! the guy was being killed, anyone with half an imagination could read the movie for free.
|
|
|
|
| *NatiMarie* |
May 28 2004, 10:14 PM
Post
#15
|
|
Guest |
Well I thought it was a good movie, but I kind of wanted to see his overall life, not just the end of it. But yeah, I liked it. Kind of changed my perspective on the whole situation of Jesus and how he sacrificed our life for us, but yeah, whatever floats your boat.
|
|
|
|
|
May 29 2004, 02:45 PM
Post
#16
|
|
 Look its... Group: Official Member Posts: 5,817 Joined: Feb 2004 Member No: 4,767 |
welli havent seen that movie all but then i dont think its a bad movie. it tell the story the same way its in the bible. if people dont like it then dont see it
|
|
|
|
| *CEP* |
May 29 2004, 08:05 PM
Post
#17
|
|
Guest |
QUOTE welli havent seen that movie all but then i dont think its a bad movie. it tell the story the same way its in the bible. if people dont like it then dont see it Yeah, but you can't truly say that it's the same as the Bible because no one lived to see how it was like - whether it was that gruesome or not. |
|
|
|
|
May 30 2004, 05:30 AM
Post
#18
|
|
 Hi! I'm Dani :) Group: Member Posts: 5,637 Joined: Feb 2004 Member No: 3,369 |
QUOTE(anqel_r0h @ May 26 2004, 1:11 AM) mel gibson did an awesome job to that movie and im glad that he made that movie and of course all christians are happy about to see that so they can see how Jesus did for us... and how he went through. that movie was awesome, even tho there was so much gore. i get to see how much pain he went through... sigh i felt bad wen they choose over the prisoner instead of Jesus...it's so weird wat did the prisoner do? he didnt do any good things...all he did was bad things... and for like Jesus, he saved so many ppls and cured them... u knoe if they werent cured the first place....one of u guys wouldnt be here in this earth by now. i agree with susan. |
|
|
|
|
May 30 2004, 02:53 PM
Post
#19
|
|
|
Senior Member Group: Member Posts: 811 Joined: Apr 2004 Member No: 11,377 |
QUOTE(loseronaisle5 @ May 26 2004, 10:33 PM) i haven't seen it, i protested against it because i don't believe in commercializing any religion especially mine to sell money and make a profit over jesus christ death, it's almost as bad as going to his real death and paying to see it for enntertainment. you might as well have been gambling for his clothing right under his feet. oh and yeah, it was supposed to be gross.. duh! the guy was being killed, anyone with half an imagination could read the movie for free. ok dunt protest w/o seeing it...make ur opinion AFTER u c it...he didnt make the movie to make money...actually no producers wuld help him so he used his OWN $$ to make it....he was in it at the end as well...his hands hold the nail at the end....n i think frum the interviews n stuff he thinks he was called to use his talents in this way to serve God n witness to ppl |
|
|
|
|
May 30 2004, 04:07 PM
Post
#20
|
|
|
Master Debater Group: Member Posts: 1,066 Joined: May 2004 Member No: 15,719 |
QUOTE he was in it at the end as well...his hands hold the nail at the end.... Haha, really? That's a tight factoid. |
|
|
|
|
May 30 2004, 04:13 PM
Post
#21
|
|
|
Senior Member Group: Member Posts: 811 Joined: Apr 2004 Member No: 11,377 |
QUOTE(WildGriffin @ May 30 2004, 4:07 PM) Haha, really? That's a tight factoid. yup it was supposly his was of saying we r all sinners...including himself...so he held the nail to show that...watch the interviews n trailers n stuff its really cool stuff....also the man who played Jesus...was struck by lightning...n when he was being whipped it pissed the pack that was supposed to protect him n gashed his skin...yes real leather with glass.......its an awesome movie....dunno if i can ever watch it again...but it was WELL DONE |
|
|
|
|
Jan 25 2007, 10:41 PM
Post
#22
|
|
|
Senior Member Group: Member Posts: 728 Joined: Jan 2007 Member No: 495,803 |
Just so you know, I have seen the movie twice and it's VERY good however I am not a Christian.
I think it was rated such a good movie one because it was a good movie, two; it was nicely done and the fact that it was sooo close to explaining the life of Jesus and because a huge star directed the movie. |
|
|
|
|
2 User(s) are reading this topic (2 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members: