Where are all the mods? |
  |
| *incoherent* |
 Jun 27 2006, 09:58 PM
Post
#101
|
|
Guest  |
but truly, id like to know since he speaks so highly of it.
|
|
|
|
| *AngelicEyz00* |
Jun 27 2006, 09:58 PM
Post
#102
|
|
Guest |
Yes Rico. What position was it that you allegedly hold?
If you're referring to when you "helped make cB 2", that doesn't count as a modding position. You might be good as a programmer, but not as a moderator. |
|
|
|
| *Programmer* |
Jun 27 2006, 09:59 PM
Post
#103
|
|
Guest |
it's an extinct one. the position with the title "programmer" since the programming...section is gone...it was the only place i held power in..only 2 other people in cb have got that rank besides me.... i lost it due to inactivity ....why so curious?
|
|
|
|
| *Statues/Shadows* |
Jun 27 2006, 10:02 PM
Post
#104
|
|
Guest |
Because no one ever believes you when you go on about this. We don't now, either. We have yet to see any evidance of it at all. Someone would remember it. No one does.
|
|
|
|
|
Jun 27 2006, 10:02 PM
Post
#105
|
|
 Senior Member  Group: Staff Alumni Posts: 7,025 Joined: Feb 2004 Member No: 4,051 |
QUOTE(pshaa.shauna @ Jun 27 2006, 9:57 PM)  What if it's like Chii, and it's due to personal reasons, and don't know when they'll be back? I had something like that awhile ago, I stepped down. She should too. |
|
|
|
|
Jun 27 2006, 10:02 PM
Post
#106
|
|
 It eats you, starting with your bottom. Group: Member Posts: 1,999 Joined: Jun 2005 Member No: 160,674 |
Rico, nominating is done by other people, not yourself.
I NOMINATE SPENCER AND NICKI. /random |
|
|
|
| *StanleyThePanda* |
Jun 27 2006, 10:03 PM
Post
#107
|
|
Guest |
I was at school when you posted this.
|
|
|
|
| *Statues/Shadows* |
Jun 27 2006, 10:03 PM
Post
#108
|
|
Guest |
^you aren't people staff either
|
|
|
|
| *incoherent* |
Jun 27 2006, 10:03 PM
Post
#109
|
|
Guest |
ill have to agree with nicki. although i doubt "program mod" was that important, even if only 2 people held the "honor", i'd like some proof.
|
|
|
|
|
Jun 27 2006, 10:03 PM
Post
#110
|
|
|
Senior Member Group: Staff Alumni Posts: 7,025 Joined: Feb 2004 Member No: 4,051 |
^x3 you're active though.
|
|
|
|
|
Jun 27 2006, 10:07 PM
Post
#111
|
|
|
It eats you, starting with your bottom. Group: Member Posts: 1,999 Joined: Jun 2005 Member No: 160,674 |
QUOTE(StanleyThePanda @ Jun 27 2006, 11:03 PM) I was at school when you posted this. MM, you're active Kara. |
|
|
|
|
Jun 27 2006, 10:08 PM
Post
#112
|
|
|
Senior Member Group: Staff Alumni Posts: 7,025 Joined: Feb 2004 Member No: 4,051 |
I think there should be a rule saying that if a mod is going to be inactive for a certain amount of time, say 3 weeks or so, they have to temporarily (I can't spell, sorry) step down
|
|
|
|
| *StanleyThePanda* |
Jun 27 2006, 10:09 PM
Post
#113
|
|
Guest |
QUOTE(Statues/Shadows @ Jun 27 2006, 11:03 PM) ^you aren't people staff either Well, she didnt specify what staff catagory. Also, I didnt know this was about activeness, I thought she meant like.. at the moment or something. 
|
|
|
|
|
Jun 27 2006, 10:10 PM
Post
#114
|
|
 What the fack. Group: Official Member Posts: 6,164 Joined: Mar 2004 Member No: 8,519 |
Edit:\\ fhaffihaf[e!!
..erm, ignore this. I think I tried replying to the wrong page in this thread. 
|
|
|
|
| *incoherent* |
Jun 27 2006, 10:10 PM
Post
#115
|
|
Guest |
kara, i dont think you have anything to worry about
|
|
|
|
|
Jun 27 2006, 10:44 PM
Post
#116
|
|
|
It eats you, starting with your bottom. Group: Member Posts: 1,999 Joined: Jun 2005 Member No: 160,674 |
She doesn't, she's good.
|
|
|
|
|
Jun 27 2006, 11:33 PM
Post
#117
|
|
 dripping destruction Group: Staff Alumni Posts: 7,282 Joined: Jun 2004 Member No: 21,929 |
mmm.
yea, staff members should step down if they have to be inactive. |
|
|
|
|
Jun 27 2006, 11:38 PM
Post
#118
|
|
 Senior Member Group: Member Posts: 793 Joined: Jun 2006 Member No: 425,250 |
HERE I AM!
|
|
|
|
| *AngelicEyz00* |
Jun 27 2006, 11:49 PM
Post
#119
|
|
Guest |
QUOTE(ZapatoDelFuego @ Jun 27 2006, 9:38 PM) HERE I AM! okay...? |
|
|
|
|
Jun 27 2006, 11:52 PM
Post
#120
|
|
 i've never wanted anything rationale. Group: Staff Alumni Posts: 8,449 Joined: May 2004 Member No: 19,045 |
Online. 3 user(s) are reading this topic. 0 guests, 1 anonymous members, 2 members.
Statues/Shadows, mipadi MICHAEL HI!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! |
|
|
|
|
Jun 27 2006, 11:55 PM
Post
#121
|
|
 Yawn Group: Staff Alumni Posts: 9,530 Joined: Nov 2004 Member No: 65,772 |
QUOTE(juliar @ Jun 27 2006, 10:51 PM) You know the mods are inactive when you talk about how a cb member died from eating a dog in a topic that's been made 8 minutes ago and still isn't closed. run on sentences power! wow. i highly disagree. 8 minutes, huh. give me a break. Think back, people were complaining about mods being too strict and tight about closing topics, hence the whole leinancy thing came to pass. Anyone could see that was a horrible idea. And now, more-or-less, mods aren't closing too many topics in the lounge anymore. However, now i'm hoping that whole lienancy phase is over. I couldn't stand that. But now atleast people know why mods need to close topics. It's either "the mods are too power hungry!" or "the mods aren't doing enough!" or "you guys are too strict!" and then the next time, "you guys are too easy!". blah. whatever. I have come to a conclusion, that no matter what we do, we will never make you guys happy. As for the inactive thing, the mods usually have good reasons for being so. We try to spend as much time on here as possible. Though, another hiring session wouldn't hurt, I can't think of anyone that really has been standing out lately as a potential mod. If you're going to comment on me being inactive, i'm sorry. I've been taking 2 tough college courses that are fit in 6 weeks, so unfortunately they are eating up all my time. I have considered stepping down at one point, however I don't think it really necessary. Although if you do have a problem with me being inactive, I guess PM me about it, or PM one of the admins or something. Try my best, and i'm being completely serious on that one. |
|
|
|
| *AngelicEyz00* |
Jun 27 2006, 11:58 PM
Post
#122
|
|
Guest |
I don't understand why you brought up the leniency thing. This has nothing to do with that.
|
|
|
|
|
Jun 28 2006, 12:00 AM
Post
#123
|
|
|
Yawn Group: Staff Alumni Posts: 9,530 Joined: Nov 2004 Member No: 65,772 |
It wasn't meant to be brought up towards this topic of inactiveness.
It was in response to Juliar. |
|
|
|
|
Jun 28 2006, 12:06 AM
Post
#124
|
|
 crushed. Group: Staff Alumni Posts: 9,432 Joined: Jun 2004 Member No: 20,026 |
Duuude, I like the moderators here. Well, at least most of them haha.
I don't really know who should become moderators because I haven't been all that active..hmmmm... |
|
|
|
| *Libertie* |
Jun 28 2006, 02:00 AM
Post
#125
|
|
Guest |
QUOTE(pshaa.shauna @ Jun 27 2006, 8:30 PM) Don't they have to show a certain amount of activity or else they get demodded? Or has that completely vanished? It's still there in a way, but it's pretty difficult to get demoted due to inactivity..QUOTE(Statues/Shadows @ Jun 27 2006, 10:02 PM) Because no one ever believes you when you go on about this. We don't now, either. We have yet to see any evidance of it at all. Someone would remember it. No one does. Actually, I think Mona told me not too long ago that it was true.  Oh, heh.. Yeah. Sorry guys, I was out pretty much the entire day. 
|
|
|
|
|
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members: