The Da Vinci Code Movie, Out in 2006 |
 Dec 30 2004, 05:30 PM
Post
#1
|
|
|
Senior Member  Group: Member Posts: 833 Joined: Oct 2004 Member No: 57,463  |
They've cast Tom Hanks as Robert Langdon.
Eh, don't how I feel about that. Don't get me wrong, Tom Hanks is an incredible actor... but I don't know if I see him as Langdon just yet. I guess, I can't really judge until the movie comes out... And I reeeeeeeeally hope they cast Kate Beckinsale as Sophie Neveu. I think she's perfect for the part. |
|
|
|
 |
Replies
(50 - 74)
|
Jul 11 2005, 04:52 PM
Post
#51
|
|
 biglamchops Group: Member Posts: 262 Joined: Jun 2005 Member No: 149,977 |
whoa! da vinci's code is getting so big now..... I hope they do the book justice.
|
|
|
|
|
Jul 11 2005, 09:12 PM
Post
#52
|
|
|
Newbie Group: Member Posts: 9 Joined: Jul 2005 Member No: 169,312 |
I'm looking forward into see this movie. In class me and my other classmates watched the trailer. It looks interesting from the trailer.
|
|
|
|
|
Jul 12 2005, 12:03 AM
Post
#53
|
|
|
Senior Member Group: Member Posts: 1,098 Joined: May 2005 Member No: 143,687 |
cant wait to see it the book was awesome they shouldve cast sean connery or pierce brosnan [sp?] as langdon
|
|
|
|
|
Jul 12 2005, 01:36 AM
Post
#54
|
|
 Rock Music Enthusiast Group: Member Posts: 430 Joined: Jun 2005 Member No: 160,803 |
beckensale would be good, but I don't think they have to do much to make this an amazing movie
it was an incredible book all by itself, I hope they don't change anything or leave anything out (even though they'll have to for time constraints) but I'll definitely go see it the weekend it comes out next year |
|
|
|
|
Jul 12 2005, 08:14 AM
Post
#55
|
|
 Queen of Random Information Group: Member Posts: 825 Joined: Jun 2005 Member No: 157,057 |
I loved the book, but I do hope the movie does it justice. As this was my second favorite book of all time, I'm going to be pretty angry if the movie is all screwed up and if they change a lot of stuff in the movie that's not supposed to be there.
|
|
|
|
|
Jul 13 2005, 04:23 PM
Post
#56
|
|
|
Senior Member Group: Member Posts: 833 Joined: Oct 2004 Member No: 57,463 |
QUOTE(ichigofan @ Jul 12 2005, 12:03 AM) cant wait to see it the book was awesome they shouldve cast sean connery or pierce brosnan [sp?] as langdon  Sean Connery would have been WAY too old for the part. Even Tom Hanks is stretching it. |
|
|
|
|
Jul 13 2005, 11:20 PM
Post
#57
|
|
 The Noob Group: Member Posts: 575 Joined: Jul 2005 Member No: 169,647 |
oo i wanna watch this movie... i kind of liked the book so mayb ill like the movie better
|
|
|
|
|
Jul 14 2005, 02:39 AM
Post
#58
|
|
|
Senior Member Group: Member Posts: 833 Joined: Oct 2004 Member No: 57,463 |
I think I'd enjoy the movie. Other than Tom Hanks, I think they did a perfect job casting the others.
Ian McKellan as Sir Leigh Teabing Alfred Molina as Bishop Aringarosa Jean Reno as Bezu Fache Paul Bettany as Silas If you want to watch the teaser trailer, go here: http://www.apple.com/trailers/sony_pictures/da_vinci_code/ |
|
|
|
|
Jul 14 2005, 04:25 PM
Post
#59
|
|
|
Member Group: Member Posts: 19 Joined: Feb 2005 Member No: 99,858 |
Never read the book, but heard the book was really good. Can't wait for the movie.
|
|
|
|
|
May 19 2006, 04:27 PM
Post
#60
|
|
 What the fack. Group: Official Member Posts: 6,164 Joined: Mar 2004 Member No: 8,519 |
I'm still waiting for my dad to give me the book, so I haven't read it yet.
 BUT. I'm going today to watch "The Da Vinci Code".
|
|
|
|
|
May 19 2006, 04:30 PM
Post
#61
|
|
 cb² Group: Member Posts: 115 Joined: Apr 2006 Member No: 393,653 |
I loved the book, but the movie was BORING.
|
|
|
|
|
May 19 2006, 04:54 PM
Post
#62
|
|
|
Senior Member Group: Member Posts: 421 Joined: Jan 2006 Member No: 362,920 |
QUOTE(Rampage @ May 19 2006, 5:30 PM) I loved the book, but the movie was BORING. It's gotten a lot of bad reviews... especially from the critics at Cannes... and it's rating on Rotten Tomatoes isn't so good. But, I've been waiting almost 2 years and bad reviews aren't going to stop me from seeing this! Hahaha. :) |
|
|
|
|
May 19 2006, 04:56 PM
Post
#63
|
|
|
What the fack. Group: Official Member Posts: 6,164 Joined: Mar 2004 Member No: 8,519 |
^True that.
|
|
|
|
|
May 19 2006, 04:59 PM
Post
#64
|
|
 in the reverb chamber. Group: Staff Alumni Posts: 4,022 Joined: Nov 2005 Member No: 300,308 |
Ron Howard, eh. This just looks plain old lame.
Not interested in the least. |
|
|
|
| *I Shot JFK* |
May 19 2006, 05:24 PM
Post
#65
|
|
Guest |
friend saw it, she said it was average.
which was to be expected. really. |
|
|
|
|
May 19 2006, 05:44 PM
Post
#66
|
|
|
Senior Member Group: Member Posts: 421 Joined: Jan 2006 Member No: 362,920 |
I wanted to see it this morning but the earliest showing was at like, 11:45 at a theater half an hour away and my bf goes to work at like, 2... :( And he gets out at like, 11:30 and latest showing is at 11:45. BOOOO. So I'm going to have to wait until tomorrow night to see it. :(
|
|
|
|
|
May 19 2006, 06:53 PM
Post
#67
|
|
 D: Group: Member Posts: 104 Joined: Apr 2006 Member No: 392,233 |
It doesn't interest me. And the fact that Tom Hanks played the main role...I just don't know =/
|
|
|
|
|
May 19 2006, 08:12 PM
Post
#68
|
|
 hi. call me linda. Group: Official Member Posts: 8,187 Joined: Feb 2004 Member No: 3,475 |
Eh, I kinda liked it. Some of it was too long, but overall I felt it was a good movie. Not what I was expecting, but not too bad either.
|
|
|
|
| *xcaitlinx* |
May 19 2006, 08:15 PM
Post
#69
|
|
Guest |
i heard that it sucked so much that people were actually LAUGHING at tom hanks...and walked out of the theater.
|
|
|
|
|
May 19 2006, 08:17 PM
Post
#70
|
|
 Krista. Group: Official Member Posts: 4,380 Joined: Apr 2006 Member No: 391,319 |
i've never read the book, but i heard the movie sucked.
|
|
|
|
| *FreeStickers* |
May 19 2006, 09:36 PM
Post
#71
|
|
Guest |
It got a lot of bad reviews, but I actually enjoyed it. I enjoyed the movie, but Tom Hanks sucks. really. I miss the old Tom Hanks.
There were protesters and all sorts of excitement! |
|
|
|
|
May 19 2006, 09:36 PM
Post
#72
|
|
|
t-t-t-toyaaa Group: Official Member Posts: 19,821 Joined: Apr 2004 Member No: 11,270 |
I liked it but if you read the book you can tell all the parts they changed and added on to. I thought it was alright. But tom hanks should not have played in the movie. Personally I think he didn't "fit".
|
|
|
|
|
May 19 2006, 09:46 PM
Post
#73
|
|
 L!ckitySplit Group: Member Posts: 4,325 Joined: Apr 2005 Member No: 129,329 |
i havent seen it yet, probably see it tomorrow,
but what the hell did Tom Hanks do wrong? i wonder. personally i think he is a better and definately more seasoned actor than "Hugh Grant or Pierce Brosnan" and definatley brought more credibility to the movie with his name on it. but we shall see. |
|
|
|
|
May 19 2006, 10:41 PM
Post
#74
|
|
|
What the fack. Group: Official Member Posts: 6,164 Joined: Mar 2004 Member No: 8,519 |
Just got back a little while ago from seeing it.
My dad read the book, and he said he prefers that rather than the movie, because Ron Howard isn't much of an action movie director. But IMO, I think it was more intended to be a mystery type of film, rather than action. Although, those two things do usually coincide with one another. I loved it though. I found it suspenseful and there were quite a few parts that made me jump.  Very mind-stimulating, I think. 
|
|
|
|
|
May 20 2006, 12:11 AM
Post
#75
|
|
 Day's Nearly Over Group: Staff Alumni Posts: 4,553 Joined: Aug 2004 Member No: 45,183 |
Just got back from a late showing...
It was pretty good. I half-slept through the violent parts (I felt people jump near me)... And... the beginning sequence scared the crap out of me. |
|
|
|
 |
7 User(s) are reading this topic (7 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members: