Log In · Register

 

Debate Rules

Here are the general forum rules that you must follow before you start any debate topics. Please make sure you've read and followed all directions.

Debate.

2 Pages V  < 1 2  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Intelligent Design, yes, another religion related topic
*mipadi*
post May 12 2006, 12:08 PM
Post #26





Guest






QUOTE(Uronacid @ May 12 2006, 1:01 PM) *
they are all theories and they are all just as plausible as the next... personality believing in a god that can cause any thing to happen and create anything that exists makes more sense to me than leaveing everything up to random chances and mutations

That's not really the issue here. The issue is whether intelligent design should be taught in a science curriculum or not. Intelligent design is not science—it doesn't fit the definition at all. That is not to say that it should not be taught; rather, that is to say it is not an acceptable part of a science curriculum.
 
flc
post May 14 2006, 12:08 AM
Post #27


× Dead as Dillinger. ♥
******

Group: Member
Posts: 1,527
Joined: Mar 2006
Member No: 384,615



QUOTE(Uronacid @ May 12 2006, 12:01 PM) *
they are all theories and they are all just as plausible as the next... personality believing in a god that can cause any thing to happen and create anything that exists makes more sense to me than leaveing everything up to random chances and mutations
This isn't a debate over which makes more sense. It's a question of whether or not "intelligent design" should be taught next to evolution.

Again, I don't think it should. Intelligent design is a good old Republican's trick, slapping a more scientific name on something that requires only faith.
 
Sumiaki
post May 15 2006, 03:45 AM
Post #28


NO WAI! R u Srs?
******

Group: Member
Posts: 1,264
Joined: Jul 2004
Member No: 28,094



I remember having to do a debate on this. I was the affirmitive side on "ID and creationism should be taught in school." When I researched it (because my teacher is an bish and gives me the opposite side of what I want) i found a very interesting "argument/example" to strengthen ID.

Take a banana. It has a self expiration date (it browns/blackens), has a tab for us humans to easily peel.

It had other examples, I'll try to find the source once I find my rebuttle speech. xD
 
flc
post May 17 2006, 08:10 AM
Post #29


× Dead as Dillinger. ♥
******

Group: Member
Posts: 1,527
Joined: Mar 2006
Member No: 384,615



QUOTE(Sumiaki @ May 15 2006, 3:45 AM) *
I was the affirmitive side on "ID and creationism should be taught in school."
Intelligent design and creationism are the same exact thing.

And, I'm not saying that "intelligent design" SHOULDN'T be taught in school at all. In fact, I think that there should be a world religions class where it could be taught. But it should never have a place next to evolution in the science classroom, ever.
 
*mipadi*
post May 17 2006, 08:30 AM
Post #30





Guest






QUOTE(Sumiaki @ May 15 2006, 4:45 AM) *
Take a banana. It has a self expiration date (it browns/blackens), has a tab for us humans to easily peel.

What about a coconut? Those things aren't easy to open at all.
 
NoSex
post May 17 2006, 04:34 PM
Post #31


in the reverb chamber.
*******

Group: Staff Alumni
Posts: 4,022
Joined: Nov 2005
Member No: 300,308



QUOTE(mipadi @ May 17 2006, 8:30 AM) *
What about a coconut? Those things aren't easy to open at all.


God hates coconuts and clearly doesn't want us to eat them. wink.gif
 
xquizit
post May 18 2006, 10:33 AM
Post #32


wanderlust personified.
*******

Group: Official Designer
Posts: 7,515
Joined: Jan 2004
Member No: 797



I think Intelligent Design is just creationism in disguise. I don't mind it being taught in schools but I don't think it should be taught as a science... which many of the ID advocates are pushing for. I think it would best fit in a Religion or a Philosophy curriculum.
 

2 Pages V  < 1 2
Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members: