Log In · Register

 
2 Pages V  < 1 2  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
abercrombie or a&f?
Aoiro
post Jan 2 2006, 08:48 PM
Post #26


Senior Member
******

Group: Member
Posts: 1,665
Joined: Apr 2005
Member No: 127,076



Eh, I totally hate both.
Some people do look okay/good in their clothing, though.

But I would never shop there.
And I haven't.

I guess A&F if I HAD to choose
 
angelrevelation
post Jan 2 2006, 10:12 PM
Post #27


You can't keep running from what you're trying to find.
*******

Group: Official Member
Posts: 5,030
Joined: Oct 2004
Member No: 54,096



they don't have an abercrombie here so... a&f. but their stuff is so expensive pinch.gif and i still haven't decided if they're racist or not lol
 
ParanoidAndroid
post Jan 3 2006, 08:53 PM
Post #28


Don't worry guys, size doesn't matter...to lesbians
******

Group: Member
Posts: 2,444
Joined: Jan 2005
Member No: 85,066



Yeah I dont shop there, and even IF (dear god IF) i EVER do..... I'll end up harrassing the customers and employees


and i would go to neither btw! im too broke to go to A&F and too big to go to Abercombie
 
pandamonium
post Jan 3 2006, 09:09 PM
Post #29


cheeeesy like theres no tomorrow
*******

Group: Member
Posts: 3,316
Joined: Aug 2004
Member No: 37,142



QUOTE(Just_Dream @ Jan 2 2006, 3:18 AM)
... Ruehl's clothing quality is way better.. whistling.gif haha But I haven't bought anything there since the sizes are way toooo big for me.

I only shop at abercrombie (kids) because the jeans fit me there and I get discounts. The jeans there are the first jeans I've ever work that fit so... well! Boo PacSun's Tilt sz. 00 jeans! :/

idk what you're talking about Val, but when I go to A&F the quality of the clothing seems the same, but bigger and might be a little bit more embellished (thus the price boost), but the material still looks and feels the same. I'd rather spend my money at Express or Nordy's (Nordstrom's), than at A&F.
*


lol its funny ruehl's ads are like porno compared to abercrombie and fitch. i never saw any of their clothes though cause umm yea.
 
Mireh
post Jan 5 2006, 12:08 AM
Post #30


original member.
*******

Group: Official Member
Posts: 4,825
Joined: Jan 2004
Member No: 1,460



i heard ruehl's clothing was a lot cheaper too?

it's targeting towards like, 30 year olds though, is it more mature?

the clothing, i mean
 
BOOGERSHAHA
post Jan 5 2006, 08:04 PM
Post #31


Senior Member
*****

Group: Member
Posts: 979
Joined: Aug 2005
Member No: 205,020



QUOTE(Mireh @ Jan 5 2006, 1:08 AM)
i heard ruehl's clothing was a lot cheaper too?

it's targeting towards like, 30 year olds though, is it more mature?

the clothing, i mean
*


there's a ruehl here and it's expensive as hell. seriously. a t shirt is like 30 bucks (on sale) and jeans are 100+
 
zoe_loves_you
post Jan 5 2006, 08:05 PM
Post #32


what da pho?!
***

Group: Member
Posts: 39
Joined: Oct 2005
Member No: 272,716



lol id go to abercrombie only because im reallly small.
 
Just_Dream
post Jan 5 2006, 11:01 PM
Post #33


durian
********

Group: Staff Alumni
Posts: 13,124
Joined: Feb 2004
Member No: 3,860



QUOTE(je like french @ Jan 5 2006, 5:04 PM)
there's a ruehl here and it's expensive as hell. seriously. a t shirt is like 30 bucks (on sale) and jeans are 100+
*

I know what you mean. It's really cool inside though. But I must say, the quality of the clothing is really good. But hey, it is more expensive than A&F.

Oh yea, and it's supposed to be targetted towards an older group, but the clothes there.. they seem too trendy to be considered older. The ad on the wall at Fashion Valley mall was misleading (before Ruehl was built) because I did NOT see much of the clothing that was shown on the ad.

As for Ruehl's ad being similar to a porno.. Wait where have you seen these ads? I've only seen one, which was prett ymuch a placeholder for where the store was going to be located, since the ad was on the wall of the building where Ruehl was being built.. Yea..
 

2 Pages V  < 1 2
Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members: