cameraaa |
![]() ![]() |
cameraaa |
![]()
Post
#1
|
|
![]() dizzy me up. ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Member Posts: 3,191 Joined: Apr 2004 Member No: 11,139 ![]() |
well im planning to get a new camera, and i was wondering if any of you have have the canon powershot sd 500. do you guys think its good? i want a camera that has 5+ megal pixels (the powershot 500 is 7.1) and overally pretty good quality. alsooo- nonblurry pictures. and .. hahah well how it looks also matters
![]() what other cameras do you guys suggest? |
|
|
![]()
Post
#2
|
|
![]() Quincy ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Member Posts: 872 Joined: Jun 2004 Member No: 23,613 ![]() |
QUOTE(sheepy @ Dec 27 2005, 12:28 AM) well im planning to get a new camera, and i was wondering if any of you have have the canon powershot sd 500. do you guys think its good? i want a camera that has 5+ megal pixels (the powershot 500 is 7.1) and overally pretty good quality. alsooo- nonblurry pictures. and .. hahah well how it looks also matters ![]() what other cameras do you guys suggest? I'd say go with it. I sell digital cameras at my local BJs wholesale club, and with what you want, I'd definitely go for the Elph you picked out. Great picture quality, good looks, and portability. Personally, and everyone has their brand, I'd prefer a Fuji Finepix camera. For what youre looking for the Z1 would be great. Small, portable, sleek and sexy, and with the Real Photo Technology from Finepix it brings taking pictures that much closer to how the eye sees them. Its got a gorgeous 2.5 inch LCD screen. Its only 5.1 megapixels compares to the Elph's 7.1, but all in all, its not going to make the biggest difference. For printing, emailing, putting on the web, or just plain personal use, 5 will do perfectly. Plus, for those quick shots, its got a mere .6 second startup and a .01 second shutter lag. Man, now I want a new camera, haha. |
|
|
![]() ![]() |