Log In · Register

 
2 Pages V   1 2 >  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
new years 2006, delayed?
omgah_itsmaggiex
post Dec 26 2005, 11:25 AM
Post #1


YEA? ILL EAT YOUR FACE OFF =]
*****

Group: Member
Posts: 345
Joined: Dec 2005
Member No: 333,087



QUOTE
Get ready for a minute with 61 seconds. Scientists are delaying the start of 2006 by the first "leap second" in seven years, a timing tweak meant to make up for changes in the Earth's rotation.

The adjustment will be carried out by sticking an extra second into atomic clocks worldwide at the stroke of midnight Coordinated Universal Time, the widely adopted international standard, the U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology said this week.

"Enjoy New Year's Eve a second longer," the institute said in an explanatory notice. "You can toot your horn an extra second this year."

Coordinated Universal Time coincides with winter time in London. On the U.S. East Coast, the extra second occurs just before 7 p.m. on New Year's Eve. Atomic clocks at that moment will read 23:59:60 before rolling over to all zeros.

A leap second is added to keep uniform timekeeping within 0.9 second of the Earth's rotational time, which can speed up or slow down because of many factors, including ocean tides. The first leap second was added on June 30, 1972, according to NIST, an arm of the U.S. Commerce Department.

Since 1999 until recently, the two time standards have been in close enough synch to escape any need to add a leap second, NIST said.

Although it is possible to have a negative leap second -- that is, a second deducted from Coordinated Universal Time -- so far all have been add-ons, reflecting the Earth's general slowing trend due to tidal braking.

Deciding when to introduce a leap second is the responsibility of the International Earth Rotation and Reference Systems Service, a standards-setting body. Under an international pact, the preference for leap seconds is December 31 or June 30.

Precise time measurements are needed for high-speed communications systems among other modern technologies.




so does that mean were counting back from 61? this is confusing. is this year leap year?
 
Levy2k6
post Dec 26 2005, 11:28 AM
Post #2


Word.
*******

Group: Member
Posts: 3,004
Joined: Jul 2004
Member No: 34,673



just don't worry about it, it's not like it really matters... no1 gets the timing exact anyways.
 
*mipadi*
post Dec 26 2005, 11:42 AM
Post #3





Guest






QUOTE(omgah_itsmaggiex @ Dec 26 2005, 11:25 AM)

so does that mean were counting back from 61? this is confusing. is this year leap year?

*

I believe it is occurring before 12 AM EST, so it probably won't affect any countdowns. And no, the next leap year is 2008. A leap year adds a whole day to the calendar; this just adds a second.
 
heyyfrankie
post Dec 26 2005, 11:46 AM
Post #4


This bitch better work!
********

Group: Staff Alumni
Posts: 13,681
Joined: Jul 2004
Member No: 28,095



it's just a second...
 
Saeglopur
post Dec 26 2005, 11:48 AM
Post #5


Day's Nearly Over
*******

Group: Staff Alumni
Posts: 4,553
Joined: Aug 2004
Member No: 45,183



^ A lotta things can happen in a second.
 
heyyfrankie
post Dec 26 2005, 11:54 AM
Post #6


This bitch better work!
********

Group: Staff Alumni
Posts: 13,681
Joined: Jul 2004
Member No: 28,095



true. ;\
 
-lana
post Dec 26 2005, 12:02 PM
Post #7


when you smile, i melt inside
******

Group: Member
Posts: 1,325
Joined: Oct 2005
Member No: 267,089



that's interesting.. ;S
 
*Weird addiction*
post Dec 26 2005, 12:21 PM
Post #8





Guest






hmm...interesting. Scientists amaze me.
 
*Programmer*
post Dec 26 2005, 12:25 PM
Post #9





Guest






weird....never thought...wow
 
klumzy
post Dec 26 2005, 01:03 PM
Post #10


Senior Member
*****

Group: Member
Posts: 538
Joined: Nov 2005
Member No: 75,615



wee got a extra second this year -.-
if i remember correctly, they add the sec around 7pm?
 
Rachel
post Dec 26 2005, 01:33 PM
Post #11


i've never wanted anything rationale.
*******

Group: Staff Alumni
Posts: 8,449
Joined: May 2004
Member No: 19,045



^yes...it says that in the article.

Anyways, that is crrrazy and cool. I probably won't be sober enough to remember that we have an extra second.
 
heyyfrankie
post Dec 26 2005, 01:47 PM
Post #12


This bitch better work!
********

Group: Staff Alumni
Posts: 13,681
Joined: Jul 2004
Member No: 28,095



even if you were sober...you wouldn't be able to tell! LMAO

tongue.gif
 
Aoiro
post Dec 26 2005, 01:47 PM
Post #13


Senior Member
******

Group: Member
Posts: 1,665
Joined: Apr 2005
Member No: 127,076



Weww...
An extra second!
MORE SLEEP.
rolleyes.gif
 
*nightmare4taki*
post Dec 26 2005, 01:48 PM
Post #14





Guest






Wow, Splendid
 
HolyMoly
post Dec 26 2005, 02:48 PM
Post #15


I like to fill pill bottles with mints and eat them on the bus..
****

Group: Member
Posts: 233
Joined: Nov 2005
Member No: 293,534



OM OM OM GOSH! WE GOT AN EXTRA SECOND! SO much to do in a second!!

Lmao, Scientest are really cool, but Seriously, adding an extra second does'nt make any sense at all. Just one second. Holy Moly.
 
*StanleyThePanda*
post Dec 26 2005, 03:11 PM
Post #16





Guest






haha one second...wow thats funny laugh.gif

"Enjoy New Year's Eve a second longer" hahahaha
 
*anubis*
post Dec 26 2005, 04:03 PM
Post #17





Guest






a second can really make a difference on earth in the long run

think of it this way:

we're only humans so we're usually only concerned with the effects that go on during our lifetimes--things that we would actually be affected by.

let's say we lost a second every year. just one second.

that's 16.7 minutes every thousand years.

that's 694 days every million years (which is almost two years behind in time pinch.gif )

and you're probably thinking "hah.. a million years. like that makes a difference"

but earth is what? 2 billion years old?

so we would be 3,805 YEARS behind if we were to lose a second off of every year.


nvm. i found out earth is actually 4.55 billion years old blink.gif

so let's do some math here. 4,550,000,000 / 60 / 24 / 365.25 = 8,650 YEARS

8,650 years behind if we were to really lose a second every year blink.gif

meaning, we'd be in the year 6645 B.C.E

that's 3 thousand years older than the oldest human remains ever found. and that's only one second.

so i'd say, a second does make a difference pinch.gif
 
imm
post Dec 26 2005, 04:21 PM
Post #18


Senior Member
*****

Group: Member
Posts: 950
Joined: Jul 2004
Member No: 30,808



^^^^ That's so....=O. It makes me want to also spend my time better -_=x

WHOAAAA that's tight. Where'd you find this? Hahaha all the clocks in my house are atomic...I wanna watch this. =D
 
Mr. Slowjamz
post Dec 26 2005, 04:37 PM
Post #19


what do you think it says....if so obvious.
******

Group: Member
Posts: 1,838
Joined: Sep 2004
Member No: 52,420



at least a little time to prepare to kiss that special someone thant you`ve been waiting for .
 
iiTsDAYNA
post Dec 26 2005, 06:54 PM
Post #20


My peanut.
*****

Group: Member
Posts: 948
Joined: Jul 2005
Member No: 187,456



Whoa. A second. Weehee! 1 second
 
demolished
post Dec 26 2005, 06:58 PM
Post #21


Senior Member
*******

Group:
Posts: 8,274
Joined: Mar 2004
Member No: 8,001



Wow ... =D i wish it was 24 hours. LOL.
 
gelionie
post Dec 27 2005, 09:28 AM
Post #22


say maydayism.
*******

Group: Staff Alumni
Posts: 7,447
Joined: Jun 2004
Member No: 26,344



Wow this is amazing.
I must remember to count down from 61 on New Year's Eve. cool.gif
 
EddieV
post Dec 27 2005, 10:32 AM
Post #23


cB Assassin
********

Group: Official Member
Posts: 10,147
Joined: Mar 2004
Member No: 7,672



I am...confused...
 
WHOngos144
post Dec 27 2005, 12:42 PM
Post #24


Diana =]
******

Group: Member
Posts: 1,318
Joined: Jul 2005
Member No: 174,147



^ Me too
 
Archana
post Dec 27 2005, 12:45 PM
Post #25


Senior Member
****

Group: Member
Posts: 290
Joined: Jun 2004
Member No: 22,423




I personally don't care, not like a second is going to affect me.
But... interesting.. I wonder what could happen? I mean, a few things can be affected in the world.. but nothing that drastic, right?

Cool article.
 

2 Pages V   1 2 >
Reply to this topicStart new topic
2 User(s) are reading this topic (2 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members: