Changes to SAT's? Options

[glit_gal]

I wasn't sure if i should put this in the debate section or the lounge so i'll let a mod decide.

College Board Weighs Dividing SAT Sections

By JUSTIN POPE, AP Education Writer 56 minutes ago

Facing complaints the SAT has grown too long, the College Board will consider allowing students to take the three parts of the newly expanded college entrance exam in separate sittings.

The statement comes as at least 200 high school counselors and a handful of college admissions officers around the country have signed a letter to the College Board, which owns the exam, expressing concerns the test's length of three hours and 45 minutes has become a burden on students.

"I think the SATs have become, for some kids, a real marathon that can be highly stressful," said signatory Bob Sweeney, college counselor at Mamaroneck High School in New York. For students with special needs who are granted extra time, he noted, the exam can stretch five or six hours.

College Board spokeswoman Chiara Coletti said her organization was already aware through survey research that many felt the test was too long, and was examining whether it could be broken up. She said it would also consider other options, such as more breaks.

"Length is something that students and their advocates are feeling keenly," she said. "So we have on our own, before this letter, been looking at ways we might be able to help with that."

Still, she said the College Board would have to examine whether the change would unfairly benefit wealthier students who could afford to take the test more often.

"There are possibilities of an equity issue here," she said.

Possible changes will be discussed by the College Board's SAT committee in May, and would have to go through several steps before final approval.

Last spring, the SAT was redesigned to add a writing section, among other changes, and expanded by 45 minutes of official test-taking time.

The counselors' letter noted that the writing section is similar to the old SAT II writing subject matter test, which students had always taken separately from the regular SAT.

Sweeney said he thinks most students would still take the exam for the first time in one sitting. But those looking to improve their scores on just one section should not be forced to retake the entire exam. He said one of his students received a perfect 800 on the writing section last spring, but was forced to retake it just to have another shot at a higher math score.

"Those of us who are dealing with this every day and dealing with the stress that kids are feeling sometimes I think have a much better perspective than the people at College Board, in terms of how it affects a kid's daily life," he said.

I think this is a good idea. I've taken the SAT's 3 times and have defintely seen how stressful it is to sit in your seat for 3 LONG hours taking the test. Of course you get breaks but they consist of I believe two 5-minute breaks and two 1-minute breaks. I also think it's a good idea to let people retake only the areas that they want to improve on rather than make them take the whole test again.

So what do you guys think of the possible changes?

[xTINAA]

I don't agree that the test should be broken up to be taken at separate times. I'd prefer to take it all at once, get it over with. Either way people are going to stress. They'd stress just as much if it was broken up as if it was all in one sitting. They still stress about each particular part of the exam. I think it's a waste of time to have to go in at separate times to take separate parts of the test.

I also don't agree that you should be able to retake only what you want to retake. I think that defeats some of the purpose of the SAT. I believe that by taking the SAT all in one sitting and having to take all of it adds stress and it tests your ability to deal with this stress.

I think that the reason why the SAT was made in the first place needs to be taken into considerations when trying to alter it.

[Levy2k6]

i'd rather take it all at once.. i just wish the breaks were longer and more breaks.. because it's like

work, work work, braek, work work work, break.. and it's ugh. lol

[Levy2k6]

i'd rather take it all at once.. i just wish the breaks were longer and more breaks.. because it's like

work, work work, break, work work work, break.. and it's ugh. lol

[anoniez]

I don't think it should be broken up.. the point of having the SAT all in one go is to test your ability to prepare for the whole thing at once as well as to take it under stress. If you could take one section at a time it would pretty much defeat the purpose of testing your preparation, since you would only have to prepare for one section.. this would really boost everyone's scores.
But yeah I've taken the old one once and the new one once.. the new one is definitely more exhausting.. I got higher scores in the new one though.. hahah.

[glit_gal]

well in the article they mentioned that the first time around you would take the test as a full section and than afterwards take only the specific sections you need to improve on. What do you think of that?

[innovation]

If they break it up, it's virtually inevitable that the College Board is going to make each section more difficult. Higher scores --> tougher curve --> harder questions to maintain the balance.

If significantly more students start doing exceptionally well on the test, there would be no way for colleges to distinguish between them, thus resulting in harder test questions.