ip bannings and the measures of Options

[*incoherent*]

james, just repropose your initial statement and well revote. im not going back through and seeing how everyone voted.

[sadolakced acid]

let's do this, it seems the easiest:


copy and paste the following list and put AYE or NAY besides each measure.



banning of IP banned user's account

banning of returned IP banned user's new account.

banning of returned IP banned user's new IP adress

allowing mods to delete posts of returned IP banned users, to be used sparsely

mandating mods to delete all posts of returned IP banned users.

calling IP banned users fuzzy monkeys.

remember, only committee members can vote. if you do not have mod powers in this forum, you are not a committee member.

[*mipadi*]

banning of IP banned user's account Aye

banning of returned IP banned user's new account. Aye

banning of returned IP banned user's new IP adress Aye

allowing mods to delete posts of returned IP banned users, to be used sparsely Nay

mandating mods to delete all posts of returned IP banned users. Nay

calling IP banned users fuzzy monkeys. Nay

[Heathasm]

banning of IP banned user's account Aye

banning of returned IP banned user's new account. Aye

banning of returned IP banned user's new IP adress Aye

allowing mods to delete posts of returned IP banned users, to be used sparsely nay

mandating mods to delete all posts of returned IP banned users. aye

calling IP banned users fuzzy monkeys. sure, why not

[*mzkandi*]

banning of IP banned user's account aye

banning of returned IP banned user's new account. aye

banning of returned IP banned user's new IP adress aye

allowing mods to delete posts of returned IP banned users, to be used sparsely nay
mandating mods to delete all posts of returned IP banned users. nay

calling IP banned users fuzzy monkeys. nay

[racoons > you]

banning of IP banned user's account Aye

banning of returned IP banned user's new account. Aye

banning of returned IP banned user's new IP adress Aye[b]

allowing mods to delete posts of returned IP banned users, to be used sparsely [b]Aye

mandating mods to delete all posts of returned IP banned users. Nay

calling IP banned users fuzzy monkeys. lol. well, considering what else i could call 'em, and the repercussions, Aye

***********

if the banning of IP things do come into play, it needs to be followed. No more thousand chances for the stevens of the world. again, im NOT trying to make this personal, nor to get him banned now, after the drama is done, but he is the best example... if anyone else has abetter one, please, let me know, because i feel stupid to keep mentioning things, and it's making a bad impression

[*incoherent*]

banning of IP banned user's account AYE

banning of returned IP banned user's new account. AYE

banning of returned IP banned user's new IP adress AYE

allowing mods to delete posts of returned IP banned users, to be used sparsely AYE

mandating mods to delete all posts of returned IP banned users. NAY

calling IP banned users fuzzy monkeys. AYYYYYYYYYYYE

[*tweeak*]

banning of IP banned user's account AYE

banning of returned IP banned user's new account. AYE

banning of returned IP banned user's new IP adress AYE

allowing mods to delete posts of returned IP banned users, to be used sparsely AYE

mandating mods to delete all posts of returned IP banned users. NAY

calling IP banned users fuzzy monkeys. not officially, but mockingly, sure

[racoons > you]

OK... vote tallies... i think some issues can be removed:

******************

banning of IP banned user's account passed with 6 ayes to 0 nays

banning of returned IP banned user's new account. passed with 6 ayes to 0 nays

banning of returned IP banned user's new IP adress.passed with 6 ayes to 0 nays


allowing mods to delete posts of returned IP banned users, to be used sparsely still open, with 3 ayes, and 3 nays

mandating mods to delete all posts of returned IP banned users. still open, wth 5 nays to 1 aye

calling IP banned users fuzzy monkeys. still open, with 4 ayes to 2 nays (how amusing)

***************

that means that sammi, katie, stephen, and rachel need only vote on the last three issues

[*disco infiltrator*]

allowing mods to delete posts of returned IP banned users, to be used sparsely Aye

mandating mods to delete all posts of returned IP banned users. Aye, but if they're suspended right away instead of that, there would be no need...(This means new posts, right? They can keep their old ones..)

calling IP banned users fuzzy monkeys. Aye to the max.

[racoons > you]

Aye, but if they're suspended right away instead of that, there would be no need...(This means new posts, right? They can keep their old ones..)

no, it would only apply to posts that had been made after tehy created an account to circumvent their suspension. previous posts would be left in place

and... you cant really vote aye for both of the first two things... they are kinda mutually exclusive... either you maddate mods to delete all the posts they see, or you give them the option to do it, based n their judgement.

it doesnt really bother me the way you voted, but it just seemed kinda silly

[Rachel]

allowing mods to delete posts of returned IP banned users, to be used sparsely: Aye-there was a reason they were banned, their posts should not be left in the forum. Most of them are spam or insults anyways.

mandating mods to delete all posts of returned IP banned users. Nay.

calling IP banned users fuzzy monkeys. Of course Aye!

[racoons > you]

allowing mods to delete posts of returned IP banned users, to be used sparsely - still open, with 5 ayes to 3 nays

mandating mods to delete all posts of returned IP banned users. Rejected, with 6 nays to 2 ayes

calling IP banned users fuzzy monkeys. Passed, with 6 ayes to 2 nays. i love that. we're all so cool.

*****

stephen and katie need only vote on that first one.

and someone update passed bylaws, por favor

[*tweeak*]

Who is Stephen?

[*incoherent*]

james, i have updated the list

since the fuzzy monkey thing passed, did you want it on the list? i added it, but i wasnt sure.

[Rachel]

Who is Stephen?

spirited auora guy maybe?

[*Guest*]

call, not calling ( on the list)

[*disco infiltrator*]

But wait, why don't we just suspend the account off the bat?..

[racoons > you]

spencer, i dont think we really need to include teh fuzzy monkey thing. mind you... it did pass.

and nicki, stephen = spiritual winged aura. who needs to actually remeber he is on the committee, as i havent seen him in forever. someone pm please, asking him to be more active, or step down. roar.

and sammi, obviously the account will be suspended (i assume you're talking aout ones created to get around suspension), but if the posts they make before they are discovered to be someone who shouldn't be here are offensive, or spammy, or whatever (mods judgement here) they should be deleted. which we are still voting on

[*disco infiltrator*]

Ooooooh I see. Thank you.

[KissMe2408]

allowing mods to delete posts of returned IP banned users, to be used sparsely:

my vote is,

AYE

[*mipadi*]

I don't understand the reasoning of deleting posts of IP-banned users who have returned. Locking the thread is enough; generally, I do not like to encourage removal of posts. Leaving a record is often times a good thing.

[*disco infiltrator*]

Not all posts. Only those where they spam bomb the site or something.

Right? *pokes others*

[sadolakced acid]

but aren't those deleted regardless?

[*mipadi*]

We should have guidelines for "sparingly". Sure, if someone spams the site, delete the cruft, but if it's just a normal post, it shouldn't be deleted.