Log In · Register

 

Debate Rules

Here are the general forum rules that you must follow before you start any debate topics. Please make sure you've read and followed all directions.

Debate.

8 Pages V  < 1 2 3 4 5 > »   
Reply to this topicStart new topic
"under God", should it be taken out??
Should "Under God" be taken out of the Pledge of Allegiance?
You cannot see the results of the poll until you have voted. Please login and cast your vote to see the results of this poll.
Total Votes: 121
Guests cannot vote 
Spirited Away
post Nov 7 2005, 06:28 PM
Post #51


Quand j'étais jeune...
*******

Group: Staff Alumni
Posts: 6,826
Joined: Jan 2004
Member No: 1,272



QUOTE(simx @ Nov 6 2005, 8:22 PM)
It really depends on how you look at it... I don't think it's necessary to take it out... this idea of seperation of church and state isn't specifically writen into our Constitution and this country *was* founded on
"Christian" values.. our founding fathers were very religious men. 

Reciting the pledge of allegiance isn't required... it's optional... if you don't feel comfortable with it you can just opt not to recite it.. it's not a big deal.

*


NO. This country was founded on the principle of religious freedom, not Christian values. The Constitution has no mention of God or Christianity. And though "seperation of Church and State" is not stated word for word, it is clearly implied by the restrictions of government 'to make laws respecting an establishment of religion". Our most important Founding Fathers were Deists. Learn your history, man. Also, the problem isn't reciting the pledge, the problem is "under God".
 
Mulder
post Nov 7 2005, 09:12 PM
Post #52


i lost weight with Mulder!
*******

Group: Official Designer
Posts: 4,070
Joined: Jan 2005
Member No: 79,019



i dont think "under god" should be in the pledge. the original pledge didnt even mention it.

this probably is converging on the american constiution thread, but america has always overstepped its boundaries on the issue of separation of church and state.
if we're attacking the issue of saying "under god", what about it being represented on our money: "in god we trust"

i dont say "under god" personally; in fact i rarely say the pledge.
 
ParanoidAndroid
post Nov 7 2005, 09:13 PM
Post #53


Don't worry guys, size doesn't matter...to lesbians
******

Group: Member
Posts: 2,444
Joined: Jan 2005
Member No: 85,066



People shouldn't take that seriously. I mean sure, it makes you compliment a god you don't believe in, but it;s notl ike they're forcing you to believe
 
coconutter
post Nov 7 2005, 10:13 PM
Post #54


omnomnom
******

Group: Member
Posts: 1,776
Joined: Jul 2005
Member No: 180,688



I think it shouldn't but, if I were in the 1800's or whenever it was created I woudl've said it should'nt because not everyone is christian. Since it's already done it shouldn't be tampered with but it should've never been put in there in the first place.
 
think!IMAGINARIL...
post Nov 7 2005, 11:26 PM
Post #55


.
*******

Group: Member
Posts: 3,264
Joined: Jan 2004
Member No: 761



i don't think forcing people to say it is appropriate, but i think people have their own right to choose if they want to say it or not.
 
WHOngos144
post Nov 9 2005, 10:01 PM
Post #56


Diana =]
******

Group: Member
Posts: 1,318
Joined: Jul 2005
Member No: 174,147



QUOTE(Podomaht @ Mar 25 2004, 8:42 PM)
nope. you dont have to say the pledge. all you have to do is stand up. respect your country.
*


yeah man.
 
timeflies51
post Nov 11 2005, 10:46 PM
Post #57


portami via
*****

Group: Member
Posts: 467
Joined: Apr 2005
Member No: 132,187



the original pledge didn't mention it. actually, the "under god" line was the last to be added.

personally, i want it to be taken out. it's not respecting everyone in the country as a whole. actually, it's going against the first amendment: freedom of religion. atheism counts. i suppose you could translate "god" into several different meanings, but i'd say that they are relating to the god mentioned in the bible. so what about islam, wicca, just religions like that?

and if you want to talk about our forefathers, they helped create the constitution too. what do you really think is more important? the fact that they mentioned god here and there, or the formation of the constitution?

(oh, and i don't say "under god" in the pledge.)
 
baakla
post Nov 12 2005, 12:34 AM
Post #58


LiCKETY SPLiT ;]
****

Group: Member
Posts: 211
Joined: Aug 2005
Member No: 202,514



if you dont like it, dont say it. simple as that.
 
*disco infiltrator*
post Nov 12 2005, 01:07 AM
Post #59





Guest






Yea, I don't say the pledge when asked to in school..

I don't think it should have been there in the first place, but it doesn't necessarily need to be taken out because it's not that big of a deal. It wasn't put in for the Christian right; it was put in to show that our country was different from the Communists, that our law was under God's, not that our country is ruled by God or something. So it doesn't really matter that it's there now, but those who put it in should have thought of what would happen after the war was over and should have considered the religious freedom that our country is supposed to have.
 
baakla
post Nov 12 2005, 03:09 AM
Post #60


LiCKETY SPLiT ;]
****

Group: Member
Posts: 211
Joined: Aug 2005
Member No: 202,514



were you being sarcastic? or you really dont say it.

our school doesnt even say the pledge. i thinks its against the law in our district or something.
 
*disco infiltrator*
post Nov 12 2005, 11:02 AM
Post #61





Guest






No, I really don't say it. We're told to, but I just stand up and nothing more.
 
vehvih
post Nov 13 2005, 07:45 PM
Post #62


Senior Member
*****

Group: Member
Posts: 604
Joined: Jun 2004
Member No: 21,133



Uh huh, I don't say the pledge of allegiance too becaue I don't plegde under God since I don't believe his existance, and I don't memorize it.

Taking the 'under God' away.. I don't know. I believe it does not only stand for Christianity and Catholicism, but the history of America where the Manifestation Destination took place. Without the belief in God, America won't be America literally. That's why I am ok with the dollar bills.
 
simx
post Nov 14 2005, 10:31 PM
Post #63


"Silly me, I thought this was a free country"
******

Group: Human
Posts: 1,666
Joined: Nov 2004
Member No: 60,913



QUOTE(monique.. @ Nov 12 2005, 3:09 AM)
were you being sarcastic? or you really dont say it.

our school doesnt even say the pledge. i thinks its against the law in our district or something.
*

yea our school district or something doesn't allow students to recite the pledge anymore...
 
emazing
post Nov 18 2005, 01:19 AM
Post #64


What a hypocrite.
******

Group: Member
Posts: 2,754
Joined: Apr 2005
Member No: 128,150



Since I am a Catholic, I strongly believe no would be the answer, and that would also be the Congress' choice when they decide to vote [2/3 have to agree to make it a law]. On the flip side, I understand that people who are non-Christian wouldn't want to offend their religion, so I guess it's 50/50. pinch.gif
The majority of Americans are either Catholic or Christian, or believe in some form of God. Hopefully, the 'under God' phrase will stay there.
 
*disco infiltrator*
post Nov 18 2005, 01:26 PM
Post #65





Guest






^ But why? What satisfaction do you take in making the rest of us recite something we don't agree with?
 
Joss-eh-lime
post Nov 19 2005, 12:19 AM
Post #66


tell me more.
******

Group: Official Member
Posts: 2,798
Joined: Jul 2004
Member No: 35,640




if there really was no god whats the harm in a few words on a dollar bill or a part of a sectence to recite each morning. theres no god actually listening right? [<sarcasm]
 
evanbunnell
post Nov 19 2005, 05:17 AM
Post #67


Physical Challenge
****

Group: Member
Posts: 181
Joined: Oct 2005
Member No: 264,490



I feel pressured into believing when I read that on the dollar bill and hear it within the pledge. I don't push my beliefs on you, I'd just like to not have others' beliefs pushed on me.
 
Retrogressive
post Nov 19 2005, 05:31 AM
Post #68


Don't wake ghostie.
*******

Group: Official Member
Posts: 3,546
Joined: Jan 2004
Member No: 2,405



I believe that this is our history, erasing history is something dictatorships do. This land was after all founded on Christian beliefs as well as freedom.
 
*disco infiltrator*
post Nov 19 2005, 01:58 PM
Post #69





Guest






NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO.
OH MY GOODNESS GRACIOUS.
People have said in this thread and others: OUR COUNTRY WAS NOT FOUNDED ON CHRISTIAN BELIEFS.

The founding fathers were deist, yes, but their religious views were not the basis for our laws. Nowhere in our Constitution does it have any religious laws besides the FREEDOM of religion. The FREEDOM to practice ANY religion and believe ANYTHING you want.

QUOTE
if there really was no god whats the harm in a few words on a dollar bill or a part of a sectence to recite each morning. theres no god actually listening right? [<sarcasm]


Because it makes those who are not Christian or even believe in a God at all feel inferior, like they don't belong.

Why are points being brought up that have already been discussed?
 
Tribal J_Rome
post Nov 19 2005, 02:07 PM
Post #70


wut wut in the butt?
******

Group: Human
Posts: 2,108
Joined: Sep 2005
Member No: 227,723



QUOTE(disco infiltrator @ Nov 19 2005, 11:58 AM)

Because it makes those who are not Christian or even believe in a God at all feel inferior, like they don't belong.

Why are points being brought up that have already been discussed?

*



word, how can there be freedom from religion if the words "under god" exist? it's everywhere, like in courts with that "do you swear to tell the truth.........so help you god" crap
 
Joss-eh-lime
post Nov 21 2005, 12:01 AM
Post #71


tell me more.
******

Group: Official Member
Posts: 2,798
Joined: Jul 2004
Member No: 35,640



QUOTE
^ But why? What satisfaction do you take in making the rest of us recite something we don't agree with?


well what satisfaction is there from not letting people say what they believe in? and like andromeda_90 said it isnt forcing you to believe anything
 
*disco infiltrator*
post Nov 21 2005, 01:05 AM
Post #72





Guest






And like I've said, more than once, it makes those of us who do not believe in God feel inferior and like we don't belong in this country.
 
waccoon
post Nov 21 2005, 01:15 AM
Post #73


We are the cure.
*******

Group: Staff Alumni
Posts: 4,936
Joined: Jan 2004
Member No: 1,456



QUOTE(disco infiltrator @ Nov 19 2005, 1:58 PM)
NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO.
OH MY GOODNESS GRACIOUS.
People have said in this thread and others: OUR COUNTRY WAS NOT FOUNDED ON CHRISTIAN BELIEFS.

The founding fathers were deist, yes, but their religious views were not the basis for our laws. Nowhere in our Constitution does it have any religious laws besides the FREEDOM of religion. The FREEDOM to practice ANY religion and believe ANYTHING you want.
Because it makes those who are not Christian or even believe in a God at all feel inferior, like they don't belong.

Why are points being brought up that have already been discussed?

*


I have never, ever, EVER heard anyone say they feel inferior because of the Pledge of Alleigance. We = You?

The constitution was written with the intent of letting everyone have their own freedoms, like religion. You have the freedom to believe anything you want, but the Pledge of Allegiance is just that, a pledge of allegiance. When you recite the Pledge, you're not supporting the idea of God, you're supporting the idea of the United States.
 
*disco infiltrator*
post Nov 21 2005, 01:19 AM
Post #74





Guest






But it includes the idea of God, saying our nation is under God, as if we follow him, as a country.
 
waccoon
post Nov 21 2005, 01:38 AM
Post #75


We are the cure.
*******

Group: Staff Alumni
Posts: 4,936
Joined: Jan 2004
Member No: 1,456



http://atheism.about.com/od/churchstatemyt...ledgeandgod.htm
I think everyone needs to read that before they post any more in this topic.

QUOTE
Politicization of the Pledge continued in earnest when, in 1942, Congress officially recognized the Pledge of Allegiance — this established their authority over it and over its use.

Through World War II, the Pledge became a symbol of national unity — so much so that, when Jehovah’s Witnesses refused to recite it, they encountered a great deal of opposition and prejudice.
They lost their first Supreme Court Case but won their second — and in the aftermath many Witnesses suffered. Among the worst incidents were the burning of a Kingdom Hall in Maine, police assisting a mob in Maryland in dispersing a Bible meeting, and nearly an entire town in Illinois attacking a group of Witnesses, which required calling in state police to protect them.

During the 1950s matters worsened as people became more and more afraid of the communists. Many people were persecuted, denied work, and even jailed for no other reason but that they allegedly had Communist leanings. In an effort to link national unity with opposition to “godless communism,” the Knights of Columbus (“Strong Right Arm of the Church”) campaigned to have the words “under God” added to the Pledge. This was around the same time, and for the same reason, that ”In God We Trust” was added to all money and made the national motto.
 

8 Pages V  < 1 2 3 4 5 > » 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
2 User(s) are reading this topic (2 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members: