new forum, WARNING: (Bylaws are not in effect yet) |
![]() ![]() |
new forum, WARNING: (Bylaws are not in effect yet) |
Oct 27 2005, 06:45 PM
Post
#26
|
|
![]() i've never wanted anything rationale. ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Staff Alumni Posts: 8,449 Joined: May 2004 Member No: 19,045 |
Hey, I don't mind if you want to look at other people.
It isn't favoritism, maybe he just thought that no one else who applied would want it. Go ahead and ask again, I don't really care. |
|
|
|
| *tweeak* |
Oct 27 2005, 07:04 PM
Post
#27
|
|
Guest |
But if they suddenly change their minds and go for Anna over Rachel, that wouldn't be fair either
|
|
|
|
Oct 27 2005, 07:34 PM
Post
#28
|
|
![]() i've never wanted anything rationale. ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Staff Alumni Posts: 8,449 Joined: May 2004 Member No: 19,045 |
Well I don't want to cause a scene over it. Whatever ya'll decide will be fine.
|
|
|
|
| *Azarel* |
Oct 27 2005, 07:50 PM
Post
#29
|
|
Guest |
QUOTE(tweeak @ Oct 27 2005, 5:04 PM) But if they suddenly change their minds and go for Anna over Rachel, that wouldn't be fair either Uh.... I'm not asking to be chosen for the committee. |
|
|
|
Oct 27 2005, 08:11 PM
Post
#30
|
|
|
dripping destruction ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Staff Alumni Posts: 7,282 Joined: Jun 2004 Member No: 21,929 |
then what exactley is in discussion now?
|
|
|
|
| *mzkandi* |
Oct 27 2005, 08:12 PM
Post
#31
|
|
Guest |
^ Someone taking Fae's spot on the commitee. It was being said they (whoever is choosing to replace her) should go over the existing applicants of people werent chosen and appoint a new commitee member from those.
|
|
|
|
| *incoherent* |
Oct 27 2005, 08:16 PM
Post
#32
|
|
Guest |
we seem good at voting. why dont we get all the applicants names together and vote on who we feel should take the spot.
|
|
|
|
| *mzkandi* |
Oct 27 2005, 08:17 PM
Post
#33
|
|
Guest |
^ Sure...you get the names, I'm too lazy right now
|
|
|
|
| *incoherent* |
Oct 27 2005, 08:22 PM
Post
#34
|
|
Guest |
i dont even remember where they are
*looks* members: its too cluttered that i cant seem to tell who wants on and who doesnt. |
|
|
|
Oct 27 2005, 08:30 PM
Post
#35
|
|
![]() creepy heather ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Official Member Posts: 4,208 Joined: Aug 2004 Member No: 41,580 |
didnt micron give james the privledge to pick whos on the committe? why should we vote o.o
|
|
|
|
| *Azarel* |
Oct 27 2005, 08:33 PM
Post
#36
|
|
Guest |
QUOTE(Heathasm @ Oct 27 2005, 6:30 PM) didnt micron give james the privledge to pick whos on the committe? why should we vote o.o Shrug. I never mentioned anything about a vote. It just seemed that this time around, James just chose from two people rather than from the original pool.
|
|
|
|
Oct 27 2005, 11:19 PM
Post
#37
|
|
|
dripping destruction ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Staff Alumni Posts: 7,282 Joined: Jun 2004 Member No: 21,929 |
well, i think it's fine.
fae's an ex mod, rachel's an ex mod. makes sense. |
|
|
|
Oct 28 2005, 06:32 AM
Post
#38
|
|
![]() Another ditch in the road... you keep moving ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Member Posts: 6,281 Joined: Jan 2005 Member No: 85,152 |
i chose from radhika and rachel because i had made that post a couple of days before i made the selection, and they were the two who expressed interest. i wanted someone who was checking regularly, and the people who saw it and replied promptly seemed to fit that best.
and out of the two, i chose rachel because she had applied originally. |
|
|
|
| *disco infiltrator* |
Oct 28 2005, 09:16 AM
Post
#39
|
|
Guest |
You posted it the day before either of them posted and they posted only 3 minutes apart, at the end of the day.
Besides, I didn't even think to check the "new forum" topic before someone sent me here. I don't think "new forum" screams out "apply if you're interested here". I don't know, you could've given more people a chance to even notice it was in here..I wouldn't have even gone here. |
|
|
|
Oct 28 2005, 11:02 AM
Post
#40
|
|
![]() Another ditch in the road... you keep moving ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Member Posts: 6,281 Joined: Jan 2005 Member No: 85,152 |
*shrugs*
i dont have the ability to create new topics at the moment, nor to pm anyone to do it for me. out of the existing threads, this seemed the best bet. at the end of the day, unless any one has an issue with the actual person who got on the committee, i dont see why this needs to be an issue. |
|
|
|
Oct 28 2005, 02:45 PM
Post
#41
|
|
![]() i've never wanted anything rationale. ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Staff Alumni Posts: 8,449 Joined: May 2004 Member No: 19,045 |
QUOTE(disco infiltrator @ Oct 28 2005, 8:16 AM) You posted it the day before either of them posted and they posted only 3 minutes apart, at the end of the day. Besides, I didn't even think to check the "new forum" topic before someone sent me here. I don't think "new forum" screams out "apply if you're interested here". I don't know, you could've given more people a chance to even notice it was in here..I wouldn't have even gone here. [Ps, I am going to be out of town until tomorrow night so I guess I'll just find out then no?] |
|
|
|
Oct 29 2005, 06:30 AM
Post
#42
|
|
![]() Another ditch in the road... you keep moving ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Member Posts: 6,281 Joined: Jan 2005 Member No: 85,152 |
im not going to ask rachel to step down, and i'm not going to redo this appointement
however, i'll keep this in mind should it become an issue again |
|
|
|
Nov 12 2005, 05:08 AM
Post
#43
|
|
![]() Another ditch in the road... you keep moving ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Member Posts: 6,281 Joined: Jan 2005 Member No: 85,152 |
someone asked me, and just6 to clarify, nicki will still havea moderator vote and palce on the committee during her suspension
|
|
|
|
Nov 12 2005, 11:16 AM
Post
#44
|
|
![]() i've never wanted anything rationale. ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Staff Alumni Posts: 8,449 Joined: May 2004 Member No: 19,045 |
^I heart your typing.
|
|
|
|
| *mona lisa* |
Nov 12 2005, 08:58 PM
Post
#45
|
|
Guest |
Who's in place of Fae since she stepped down from By-Laws?
|
|
|
|
| *tweeak* |
Nov 12 2005, 08:58 PM
Post
#46
|
|
Guest |
Rachel, I think.
|
|
|
|
Nov 13 2005, 06:33 AM
Post
#47
|
|
![]() Another ditch in the road... you keep moving ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Member Posts: 6,281 Joined: Jan 2005 Member No: 85,152 |
yes. rachel got her place
|
|
|
|
Nov 13 2005, 10:50 PM
Post
#48
|
|
![]() i've never wanted anything rationale. ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Staff Alumni Posts: 8,449 Joined: May 2004 Member No: 19,045 |
Random but, am I going to get the mod powers for being on the committee? I don't really care either way actually, just been on my mind.
|
|
|
|
Nov 14 2005, 02:34 PM
Post
#49
|
|
![]() Another ditch in the road... you keep moving ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Member Posts: 6,281 Joined: Jan 2005 Member No: 85,152 |
OOPS.
my advice is too pm jusun or an admin (admin is probably a better bet) to give you the powers... i would have dealt with it earlier, but it slipped my mind, sorry |
|
|
|
| *tweeak* |
Nov 14 2005, 03:06 PM
Post
#50
|
|
Guest |
HEY I still have modly powers in here
|
|
|
|
![]() ![]() |