Warnings and bannings, the process of |
  |
| *brownsugar08* |
 Oct 16 2005, 12:10 PM
Post
#51
|
|
Guest  |
Oh.
 Sounds like a good idea to me. [The two weeks thing]. |
|
|
|
|
Oct 16 2005, 12:32 PM
Post
#52
|
|
 Another ditch in the road... you keep moving  Group: Member Posts: 6,281 Joined: Jan 2005 Member No: 85,152 |
^
yes, but the point im trying to make is there ough tto be a fixed amount of time before they come off the list |
|
|
|
|
Oct 16 2005, 04:12 PM
Post
#53
|
|
 dripping destruction Group: Staff Alumni Posts: 7,282 Joined: Jun 2004 Member No: 21,929 |
how about the warning mod sets the time, with a minimum of two weeks.
in case something warrrents a longer than two weeks lifetime, they can put that in the verbal warning thread along with the warning. |
|
|
|
| *mzkandi* |
Oct 16 2005, 04:16 PM
Post
#54
|
|
Guest |
^ I think that would be good.
|
|
|
|
| *disco infiltrator* |
Oct 16 2005, 11:32 PM
Post
#55
|
|
Guest |
|
|
|
|
|
Oct 17 2005, 05:23 PM
Post
#56
|
|
|
Another ditch in the road... you keep moving Group: Member Posts: 6,281 Joined: Jan 2005 Member No: 85,152 |
i'll agree with that
|
|
|
|
| *incoherent* |
Oct 17 2005, 06:02 PM
Post
#57
|
|
Guest |
agreed
|
|
|
|
|
Oct 18 2005, 11:07 PM
Post
#58
|
|
 Yawn Group: Staff Alumni Posts: 9,530 Joined: Nov 2004 Member No: 65,772 |
awesome idea
|
|
|
|
|
Oct 19 2005, 06:25 AM
Post
#59
|
|
|
Another ditch in the road... you keep moving Group: Member Posts: 6,281 Joined: Jan 2005 Member No: 85,152 |
5 ayes, 0 nays for justin's idea about specified individual expiration dates for verbal warnings, to be posted backstage for mods' reference
|
|
|
|
| *not_your_average* |
Oct 21 2005, 06:52 PM
Post
#60
|
|
Guest |
Wait, quick question: Warnings are PMed to the offender, right? Because whenever I go into certain topics, I see a mod saying, "So-and-so, this is your first verbal warning for such-and-such."
|
|
|
|
| *incoherent* |
Oct 21 2005, 11:04 PM
Post
#61
|
|
Guest |
yeah. the system i believe is set up so that when warned, an email or p/m can be sent to the person stating why. or you can just click on the __% at the bottom under all of your info and itll say who has warned you and what not. if its at 0, no one has warned you.
|
|
|
|
|
Oct 21 2005, 11:06 PM
Post
#62
|
|
 creepy heather Group: Official Member Posts: 4,208 Joined: Aug 2004 Member No: 41,580 |
well verbal warnings arent PMed to the person
|
|
|
|
| *incoherent* |
Oct 21 2005, 11:07 PM
Post
#63
|
|
Guest |
QUOTE(Heathasm @ Oct 21 2005, 11:06 PM) well verbal warnings arent PMed to the person i meant to add that. thank you.
 |
|
|
|
|
Oct 22 2005, 10:45 AM
Post
#64
|
|
|
dripping destruction Group: Staff Alumni Posts: 7,282 Joined: Jun 2004 Member No: 21,929 |
i think verbal warnings should be PMed and posted, to remove confusion.
this way people know that these people were verbally warned, and the person knows it was them. |
|
|
|
|
Oct 22 2005, 01:44 PM
Post
#65
|
|
|
Yawn Group: Staff Alumni Posts: 9,530 Joined: Nov 2004 Member No: 65,772 |
QUOTE(sadolakced acid @ Oct 22 2005, 10:45 AM) i think verbal warnings should be PMed and posted, to remove confusion. this way people know that these people were verbally warned, and the person knows it was them. ^ I agree. Verbal Warnings are best served with a PM. |
|
|
|
|
Oct 23 2005, 05:14 AM
Post
#66
|
|
|
Another ditch in the road... you keep moving Group: Member Posts: 6,281 Joined: Jan 2005 Member No: 85,152 |
i whole heartedly agree.
if a mod gives a verbal warning, it needs to be clear. a PM removes that ambiguity. |
|
|
|
|
Oct 23 2005, 05:43 AM
Post
#67
|
|
|
creepy heather Group: Official Member Posts: 4,208 Joined: Aug 2004 Member No: 41,580 |
yeah deffinately
i alawys though verbal warnings should be PMed because people dont always look back on threads they post in |
|
|
|
|
Oct 23 2005, 05:47 AM
Post
#68
|
|
|
Another ditch in the road... you keep moving Group: Member Posts: 6,281 Joined: Jan 2005 Member No: 85,152 |
indeed. ok. lets formalize
all in favor of mods sending a pm when they give a verbal warning say aye aye! |
|
|
|
|
Oct 23 2005, 05:59 AM
Post
#69
|
|
|
creepy heather Group: Official Member Posts: 4,208 Joined: Aug 2004 Member No: 41,580 |
aye!
|
|
|
|
| *disco infiltrator* |
Oct 23 2005, 08:39 AM
Post
#70
|
|
Guest |
Aye.
|
|
|
|
|
Oct 23 2005, 02:42 PM
Post
#71
|
|
|
Another ditch in the road... you keep moving Group: Member Posts: 6,281 Joined: Jan 2005 Member No: 85,152 |
bumped
|
|
|
|
| *mzkandi* |
Oct 23 2005, 02:44 PM
Post
#72
|
|
Guest |
aye
We're suppose to that anyways though..... |
|
|
|
|
Oct 23 2005, 02:49 PM
Post
#73
|
|
|
Another ditch in the road... you keep moving Group: Member Posts: 6,281 Joined: Jan 2005 Member No: 85,152 |
yeah, but this formalizes it, and gets it set in stone
just because we are including somethin gin the bylaws doesnt mean it has to change. there are areas where things are fine as they are. but we have to agree on that oh, and 5 ayes 0 nays |
|
|
|
| *tweeak* |
Oct 23 2005, 05:44 PM
Post
#74
|
|
Guest |
I want to say nay, but I can't think of a decent reason why, excpet that whenever I PM people verbal warnings, as nice as I try to be, it usually results in them cursing me out, me losing my pacience, and suspending them. But, uh, decent reason, right...
|
|
|
|
|
Oct 23 2005, 05:45 PM
Post
#75
|
|
|
Another ditch in the road... you keep moving Group: Member Posts: 6,281 Joined: Jan 2005 Member No: 85,152 |
surely part of 'being a good mod' is dealing with such eventualities?
anyway, are you actually voting nay, or not? |
|
|
|
|
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members: