Log In · Register

 

Debate Rules

Here are the general forum rules that you must follow before you start any debate topics. Please make sure you've read and followed all directions.

Debate.

11 Pages V  « < 8 9 10 11 >  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
is bush at fault?
latinprep12
post Sep 12 2005, 09:03 PM
Post #226


M.a. x.
******

Group: Member
Posts: 1,913
Joined: Jun 2005
Member No: 148,641



QUOTE(mipadi @ Sep 12 2005, 9:46 PM)
There is a thread about this issue already--no need to start another one about it.
*


theres a differ i showed you facts and showed you what the press said
and this is the other topics starter post

QUOTE(tweeak @ Sep 1 2005, 10:20 PM)
to begin with, i'd like to point out that I do not support Bush. However, I cannot understand why people are blaming him for Katrina, just because he has troops in Iraq. It seems like a lame excuse to protest the war and find a scapegoat for the hurricane

so, do you think Bush is at fault for part of the Katrina ordeal?
*


theres not that much in common except were both talking about the Hurricane
 
*mipadi*
post Sep 12 2005, 09:10 PM
Post #227





Guest






QUOTE(latinprep12 @ Sep 12 2005, 10:03 PM)
theres a differ i showed you facts and showed you what the press said
and this is the other topics starter post
theres not that much in common except were both talking about the Hurricane
*

Both of them are discussions on who is at fault. Your facts could have been included in an argument made in the other thread.
 
ClaudelGFX
post Sep 12 2005, 09:19 PM
Post #228


WarPath Leader.
*****

Group: Member
Posts: 668
Joined: Aug 2005
Member No: 216,721



No, all those who lives in USA, live's in a BOX and listens the same LIES everyday, the only way to see USA is from OUTSIDE not from INSIDE.

Remember that.
IMO.Only.
 
*mzkandi*
post Sep 12 2005, 09:24 PM
Post #229





Guest






Topic Merged
 
steezahh
post Sep 12 2005, 09:58 PM
Post #230


"my girls rock balenciaga and smoke mad marijuana"
******

Group: Member
Posts: 2,089
Joined: Dec 2004
Member No: 70,049



im republican [y'alls hate me now huh?] so i support mostly everything Bush decideds to do; hes the presedent so if he choses it thier must be something good coming sooner or later; not always bad!
 
sadolakced acid
post Sep 12 2005, 10:01 PM
Post #231


dripping destruction
*******

Group: Staff Alumni
Posts: 7,282
Joined: Jun 2004
Member No: 21,929



i'm sorry does cB have a mindless follower alarm cus i think you just set it off.

 
technicolour
post Sep 12 2005, 10:10 PM
Post #232


show me a garden thats bursting to life
********

Group: Staff Alumni
Posts: 12,303
Joined: Mar 2005
Member No: 115,987



QUOTE(sadolakced acid @ Sep 12 2005, 7:58 PM)
or, kristina, make a movie about bush's briliant handlign of katrina.

the man will probably exagerate, and you can't take half the things he says as true, what what it will do is inspire people to research it for themselves, which is always good.
*


yes he does inspire people..but its the exaggerating that really pisses me off.

My dad complains that I exaggerate too much..and its just...

makes me mad.

stubborn.gif

When it comes to him...

roar.



WHO THE HELL STARTED ANOTHER TOPIC?!
Yesh. Click and read before.




GOVERMENT and BUSH are two completely and utterly seperate things.


Sry. I just wanted to write big too.
 
Rikkiismyname
post Sep 12 2005, 10:23 PM
Post #233


Umm its that thing you should call me......
****

Group: Member
Posts: 111
Joined: Mar 2005
Member No: 112,898



I don't get why everyone is blaming bush when the people that stayed in LA had about three weeks advanced notice of the hurricane and still they refused to leave. Then what happened to their escape plan. The mayor said, "Our plan worked perfectly," but I want to know what plan of theirs worked when they had to call in the national guard to come up with the escaped plan they used.
 
Mulder
post Sep 12 2005, 10:42 PM
Post #234


i lost weight with Mulder!
*******

Group: Official Designer
Posts: 4,070
Joined: Jan 2005
Member No: 79,019



QUOTE(sprinkle-the-stars @ Sep 12 2005, 10:10 PM)
roar.
WHO THE HELL STARTED ANOTHER TOPIC?!
Yesh. Click and read before.

GOVERMENT and BUSH are two completely and utterly seperate things.


Sry. I just wanted to write big too.
*


haha. amen.

i kinda avoided this topic for a while. now i see that y'all needed my words of wisdom and guidance.


haha. my non-a-hole liberalness.

bush cannot do everything. he could'nt have forced everyone out of new orleans and mississippi..first of all he'd be violating rights, and 2nd..it just wouldn't be possible.

private citizens can bus people out. thats their own thing. they use their money.

its different when it comes to government. and whether or not FIMA did not satisfactorally respond is not under Bush's control. He should have tried to...guide the FIMA guy, not that i'd trust bush to do that..but in the end, it really can't be attributed to him.


none of this can be attributed to him. blame the government all you want. that doesn't mean the same thing as blaming bush.


how was that? im really tired..im not sure what im saying..
 
ComradeRed
post Sep 13 2005, 08:50 AM
Post #235


Dark Lord of McCandless
******

Group: Member
Posts: 2,226
Joined: May 2004
Member No: 16,761



QUOTE(Levy2k6 @ Sep 12 2005, 8:50 PM)
yeah....

"it is the primary responsibility of state and local governments - not the federal government - to respond."

i hate ppl always blaming bush! it always starts at the local level! ITS A PYRAMID! local-state-national!

anyways.. most of the reason people didn't leave was because they though it would miss them AGAIN... hmm..  anyways... even when people realized they were gonna get RAINED ON.. winds and stuff was probaly too hard to get to the busses... if u ask me.. i rather be indoors than out on the streets trying to escape.
*


Um... my point was, the state government COULDN'T respond, because two-thirds of their emergency personnel are in Iraq, so it's the Federal government's fault for disarming the state governments.

SA: The national guard is still a collection of state militias. They are still state forces. The consequences of the disaster are limited to individual states (Louisiana, Mississippi, and Alabama, in this case), and thus each state's militia ("national guard") is responsible for taking care of its own citizens, not the Federal government.
 
*kryogenix*
post Sep 13 2005, 02:33 PM
Post #236





Guest






http://www.cnn.com/2005/POLITICS/09/13/kat...gton/index.html

Bush takes responsibility for Federal failures.

However, I still believe that most of the blame should go on the governor of Lousiana.
 
technicolour
post Sep 13 2005, 06:26 PM
Post #237


show me a garden thats bursting to life
********

Group: Staff Alumni
Posts: 12,303
Joined: Mar 2005
Member No: 115,987



^ YES! IT SHOULD!

That guy was shadier than slim shady himself.

QUOTE(micheel (insomniac))
bush cannot do everything. he could'nt have forced everyone out of new orleans and mississippi..first of all he'd be violating rights, and 2nd..it just wouldn't be possible.

private citizens can bus people out. thats their own thing. they use their money.

its different when it comes to government. and whether or not FIMA did not satisfactorally respond is not under Bush's control. He should have tried to...guide the FIMA guy, not that i'd trust bush to do that..but in the end, it really can't be attributed to him.


But fhidso;anfdo. Yes! You couldn't have forced those who didn't want out out..
 
sadolakced acid
post Sep 13 2005, 09:06 PM
Post #238


dripping destruction
*******

Group: Staff Alumni
Posts: 7,282
Joined: Jun 2004
Member No: 21,929



who appointed the director of FEMA?

i think, often, presidents or congressmen throw the blame on an appointed official, like, say, the director of NASA.

but these people are chosen by someone. and that person must know they're appointing incompetince.

the blame goes around.


"He [brown] was appointed in January 2003 by President George W. Bush, after serving as Deputy FEMA Director since 2001."

from the wikipedia article on it.

why would bush think that brown could handle the job? the arabian horses? was it that that convinced bush brown was the best man for the job?

politics. i'll bet michael brown is either a personal friend of bush's or him (or his company) donated something to bush's campaign.

and that, in my opinion, makes brown and the congress that approved him, as well as bush, at fault.
 
technicolour
post Sep 13 2005, 09:09 PM
Post #239


show me a garden thats bursting to life
********

Group: Staff Alumni
Posts: 12,303
Joined: Mar 2005
Member No: 115,987



Ok..so the blame goes all around.

But i've heard these people on the radio blaming bush directly. It's pissing me off.

I won't sit here and say hell no it's not bush's fault at all..it is to a certain extent..but then comes the pointing of the fingers at other high ranked people.

god..politics...
 
*disco infiltrator*
post Sep 15 2005, 05:34 PM
Post #240





Guest






All people deserve blame, yes. However, the mayor, governer, etc. all are in control of their own states & towns. Our president is in charge of what happens to all of us. Obviously, to those who don't live there, his mistakes are a much bigger deal.

We know everyone dropped the ball, but what the mayor, governer, etc. of Louisiana and Mississippi do doesn't affect us. I know it's a big deal, but it's a much bigger deal to make mistakes on a national scale, affecting an entire country. If Bush makes all these mistakes, who knows what he can do to mess up more than just the affected places?
 
ComradeRed
post Sep 15 2005, 10:56 PM
Post #241


Dark Lord of McCandless
******

Group: Member
Posts: 2,226
Joined: May 2004
Member No: 16,761



QUOTE(kryogenix @ Sep 13 2005, 2:33 PM)
However, I still believe that most of the blame should go on the governor of Lousiana.
*


Why though? He didn't have adequate manpower to respond, and the levees were maintained by the Federal government, not the state government.
 
fameONE
post Sep 16 2005, 05:24 AM
Post #242


^_^
*******

Group: Staff Alumni
Posts: 8,141
Joined: Jan 2005
Member No: 91,466



QUOTE(ComradeRed @ Sep 15 2005, 9:56 PM)
Why though? He didn't have adequate manpower to respond, and the levees were maintained by the Federal government, not the state government.
*


But he did give the Director of Homeland Security the ok to block of the city and not let the Red Cross in while not allowing people out.

The last time a bunch of angry black folks mobilized, it was '92 in Watts. People in power should really rethink some of their decisions and learn from the past.
 
*disco infiltrator*
post Sep 16 2005, 04:43 PM
Post #243





Guest






BRANDON!!

Anywho...hm, is anyone gonna read my post before this one?...

Preeeetty much cancels out this current little argument.
 
sadolakced acid
post Sep 16 2005, 10:59 PM
Post #244


dripping destruction
*******

Group: Staff Alumni
Posts: 7,282
Joined: Jun 2004
Member No: 21,929



governor of lousiana is a she, last time i checked.


and she has admited she should has asked for specifics, instead of general help.

which is, to quote someone, like refusing to help a drowning person unless they ask for one life preserver.

in fact, both the mayor of new orleans and the governor of lousiana followed federal guidelines.

why were all those school buses left there, unused?

FEMA refused to allow them to use them, saying they had enough buses. but theproblem was, the buses were days away, which FEMA didn't realize. the governor of lousiana had to violate a federal order in order to order those buses used, at that time it was too late.
 
AngryBaby
post Sep 17 2005, 07:17 PM
Post #245


L!ckitySplit
*******

Group: Member
Posts: 4,325
Joined: Apr 2005
Member No: 129,329



didnt bush already admit it was his fault? i read it in a paper today

QUOTE(sprinkle-the-stars @ Sep 12 2005, 8:04 PM)
Newsflash:

taken from imdb.com


If someone doens't shut this fag up, then by god I WILL!
*


lol go Moore!
 
*xcaitlinx*
post Sep 17 2005, 10:30 PM
Post #246





Guest






^^ ahh i can't wait to see it!!!

bah...i think it's pointless to argue about this situation now. the government is obviously handling it and there's nothing we can do about it.



btw...a lot of you aren't getting that there weren't enough buses to evacuate over a million people. that's inevitable.
 
verlorenrivets
post Nov 13 2005, 02:33 AM
Post #247


Resident Jerk. Is Wade. Respond to PM's!
*****

Group: Member
Posts: 344
Joined: Nov 2005
Member No: 289,510



QUOTE(mipadi @ Sep 1 2005, 8:30 PM)
No, I think meteorological systems are.

Oh, and whoever the idiots were that said, "I know, let's build a city next to a river, lake, and ocean, but let's build it below sea level."

However, I don't think Bush is at fault. The National Guard is a bit overextended, and this is a good reason why they should be kept at home, not sent overseas, but I think we still have the manpower to cover this sort of emergency.
*

^ He just stated everything for me, so I'm just going to quote it and leave it at that.

Smart fellow.
 
*tweeak*
post Nov 13 2005, 02:35 AM
Post #248





Guest






This topic is still alive? Wow. Yes, Michael is smart indeed.
 
*disco infiltrator*
post Nov 13 2005, 03:40 AM
Post #249





Guest






Elongate topic lives! It's good to do. Don't let 'em die, no no no! Death is bad.

Bien sur, Michael is quite smart. He's in college. Duh.

tongue.gif
 
*mipadi*
post Nov 13 2005, 03:46 AM
Post #250





Guest






QUOTE(disco infiltrator @ Nov 13 2005, 3:40 AM)
Bien sur, Michael is quite smart. He's in college. Duh.
*

Give me some credit. I was smarter when I was in high school.
 

11 Pages V  « < 8 9 10 11 >
Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members: