Log In · Register

 
2 Pages V   1 2 >  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
What are the specs on your computer?
MeanBastard
post Aug 30 2004, 07:39 PM
Post #1


You guys are dumb.
******

Group: Member
Posts: 1,252
Joined: Jun 2004
Member No: 25,094



Processor: P2 450 Mhz
Memory: 192 Ram
Harddrive size: 10GBs total

God its pathetic. ;_;
 
DrNick311
post Aug 30 2004, 07:41 PM
Post #2


.
******

Group: Member
Posts: 1,488
Joined: Feb 2004
Member No: 3,625



AMD Athlon XP 2400+
512 MB Ram
120 GB HD (80/40)
Windows XP Corporate
and some other stuff that I can't be bothered to list here. Saving up for a AMD 64-bit workstation though.
 
capsule
post Aug 30 2004, 07:44 PM
Post #3


ㅋㅋㅋ
*****

Group: Member
Posts: 924
Joined: Jun 2004
Member No: 24,283



my laptop....
Dell Inspiron 4150
Intel Pentium 4 - M: 2.0 GHz
384MB of RAM
30 GB of HD
Windows XP Home

Its not a kickass notebook, but it gets the job done...as for games, thats why i use a desktop.

My iMac
800 MHz PowerPC G4
256MB of RAM
60 GB of HD
Mac OS X Version 10.2.8

My HP desktop
Intel Pentium 4: 2.53 GHz
512 MB of RAM
80 GB of HD
Windows XP Pro
 
ikayto
post Aug 30 2004, 08:16 PM
Post #4


Assistant Manager of Personal
******

Group: Member
Posts: 1,101
Joined: Jul 2004
Member No: 26,922



AMD XP Athlon 2400+
512 Corsair DDR Ram
Soyo KT400 Dragon-Lite Platnium motherboard
266 FSB
(1)80GB HD - main hd
(1)20 GB HD - for all my songs ^__^
cd/dvd burner
pirated xp pro ;p
 
F1R3B4T
post Aug 31 2004, 02:53 AM
Post #5


Senior Member
******

Group: Member
Posts: 1,384
Joined: Aug 2004
Member No: 37,337



QUOTE(th5418 @ Aug 30 2004, 7:39 PM)
Processor: P2 450 Mhz
Memory: 192 Ram
Harddrive size: 10GBs total

God its pathetic. ;_;

... damnit u have such a good comp
u think u pathetic?

P2 450 or so Mhz
128MB ram
HD: 8gb + 4gb (i dont realli use the 4 gb)

this is the comp im running right now...

my dad's comp specs::
120gb HD
1gb ram (1024mb)
and i think it was P4 HTT 3.4ghz or so dun realli remember
 
audiodemon
post Jul 24 2005, 05:02 PM
Post #6


[973]-audi0demon-[eDa]
***

Group: Member
Posts: 89
Joined: Jul 2005
Member No: 171,272



My most recent build with everything (way to bring this thread back alive):

Outside:
Samsung SyncMaster 17" CRT ($150)
Logitech bundle w/ MX310 ($50)
Miyako 2.1 Speakers ($40)
Sony Noise Canceling Headphones ($60)

Inside:
Thermaltake Soprano w/ 430W PSU ($100)
Western Digital 320GB Hard Drive ($175)
Pentium 4 3.2Ghz Socket T ($190)
Kingston 1GB (2x512MB) ValueRAM ($80)
ATI Radeon X700 Pro ($130)
AOPEN I915GA-E Motherooard ($120)
Rosewill CD-RW/DVD Combo ($30)

$1025 = total.

It's not top of the line, but I can play Half-Life 2 and stuff.
 
jennyjenny
post Jul 24 2005, 10:36 PM
Post #7


Senior Member
*******

Group: Member
Posts: 4,357
Joined: Jul 2004
Member No: 28,115



I hate my computer. I can't even play gunbound.

631MHz.
256MB of RAM.
10GB HD.
 
*RiC3xBoy*
post Jul 24 2005, 11:31 PM
Post #8





Guest






Processor: AMD Athlon64 3200+ 2.0 GHz
Video Card: NVidia Geforce 6600 GT
DDR Memory: 1 GiG
 
medic
post Jul 25 2005, 12:54 AM
Post #9


Seoul Rocks!
*****

Group: Member
Posts: 936
Joined: Jun 2005
Member No: 155,811



My Dell came built with,
Pentium Extreme Edition Dual Core w/ HT Tech (3.20GHz, 800FSB)
Windows XP Pro
CompleteCare Accidental Damage Svc to 4Yr Lim Warranty & 4Yr Ltd Warr, 4Yr At-Home plus nights and weekends
3GB Dual Channel DDR2 SDRAM at 667MHz - 4 DIMMs
Main HDD - 1TB Performance RAID 0 (2 x 500GB SATA II HDDs)
2nd HDD - 500GB Serial ATA II Hard Drive (7200RPM)
Dual Drives: 48x CD-RW Drive + 16x DVD+/-RW w/ double layer write capable
20 inch UltraSharp™ 2005FPW Widescreen Digital Flat Panel
256MB PCI Express x16 (DVI/VGA/TV-out) ATI Radeon X850 XT PE
Dell 5650 5.1 100 Watt Surround Sound Speaker System with Subwoofer
Dell Wireless Keyboard and Optical Mouse

All my friends were like OO GET AMD ITS SO MUCH BETTER, and well I got me a Dual Core Extreme - I don’t think AMD even has technology close the Pentium Extreme Edition Dual Core w/ HT Tech . There top of the line Dual core is around the same speeds of the lowest Intel Dual Core last time I looked in on AMDs website.

I use to own an eMachines, so I spoiled myself.
 
*RiC3xBoy*
post Jul 25 2005, 01:26 AM
Post #10





Guest






Just outta curiosity, how much FPS do you get on a game like Battlefield 2? As for the AMD thing, there is nothing close to 3.0 GHz CPU for AMD, but I still think its a better processor for gaming.
 
*mipadi*
post Jul 25 2005, 07:15 AM
Post #11





Guest






PC
AMD Sempron 3100+ @ 1800 MHz
Asus K8N4E motherboard
Windows XP Pro
1GB PC 3200 RAM
160GB HDD
128MB ATI Radeon X300 (PCI-e)
17" in. Dell M781s CRT monitor
10/100/1000 Ethernet

iBook
PowerPC G3 @ 700 MHz
Mac OS X 10.3.9
640MB PC133 RAM
40 GB HDD
32MB ATI Radeon 7500
12-inch LCD
10/100 Ethernet; 801.11b wireless

iMac (used primarily as a router)
PowerPC G3 @ 233 MHz
Fedora Core 4 (Linux)
256MB RAM
6GB HDD
6MB VRAM
15" screen
10/100 Ethernet

Mac Classic II
Motorolo 68030 @ 16 MHz
Macintosh System 7.1
4MB RAM
70MB HDD
9" B&W display
no networking capability
 
audiodemon
post Jul 25 2005, 10:54 AM
Post #12


[973]-audi0demon-[eDa]
***

Group: Member
Posts: 89
Joined: Jul 2005
Member No: 171,272



I still say Pentium over AMD. Think about it; Alienware computers are one of the most high performance desktop PCs and they run P4. Besides, I've been Pentium-biased for years now.
 
*mipadi*
post Jul 25 2005, 11:01 AM
Post #13





Guest






At the same time, though, Opteron-based servers are some of the fastest and most powerful on the market, and far better than anything Intel offers.

It's all about application. Some processors are better for certain tasks. I go with AMD because it's cheaper, not because of any performance boost.

Of course, ultimately, I prefer the PowerPC.
 
*kryogenix*
post Jul 25 2005, 11:56 AM
Post #14





Guest






QUOTE(mipadi @ Jul 25 2005, 11:01 AM)
At the same time, though, Opteron-based servers are some of the fastest and most powerful on the market, and far better than anything Intel offers.

It's all about application. Some processors are better for certain tasks. I go with AMD because it's cheaper, not because of any performance boost.

Of course, ultimately, I prefer the PowerPC.
*


Yeah, I go with AMD because it's more bang for the buck. Although I am typing this on a P4 system.
 
medic
post Jul 25 2005, 08:05 PM
Post #15


Seoul Rocks!
*****

Group: Member
Posts: 936
Joined: Jun 2005
Member No: 155,811



QUOTE(mipadi @ Jul 25 2005, 10:01 AM)
At the same time, though, Opteron-based servers are some of the fastest and most powerful on the market, and far better than anything Intel offers.

It's all about application. Some processors are better for certain tasks. I go with AMD because it's cheaper, not because of any performance boost.

Of course, ultimately, I prefer the PowerPC.
*


I would have to say Intel Xeon is the most widely used processor in the server market. A dual Xeon is expensive but it is worth the money in the long run, especially in the game server department and the web hosting department. Most team speaks, game servers, and hosting companies are ran off of Dual Xeons. Intel still dominates the market, no dought about it. Its on a larger demand scale than AMD or PowerPC.
 
*mipadi*
post Jul 25 2005, 09:23 PM
Post #16





Guest






I'm going to have to respectfully disagree. Intel might have more market share, but an Opteron-based server is more powerful than a Xeon-based server (especially when running Linux). This article sums up that sentiment nicely: "It's really hard not to be charmed by AMD, especially when you see the performance of a decked out Opteron-based server compared to anything else on the market, including an XServe" [1].
 
Baku
post Jul 25 2005, 09:27 PM
Post #17


baker o.O
*****

Group: Member
Posts: 446
Joined: Feb 2005
Member No: 97,190



amd 64 bit 3000+
solteck mobo
gforce 5200
500wt psu
52x cd rom
1 40gig, 2 120 gig, 1 200 gig hard drives
1 gig pc3200 ram
17" lcd
 
medic
post Jul 25 2005, 09:39 PM
Post #18


Seoul Rocks!
*****

Group: Member
Posts: 936
Joined: Jun 2005
Member No: 155,811



QUOTE(mipadi @ Jul 25 2005, 8:23 PM)
I'm going to have to respectfully disagree. Intel might have more market share, but an Opteron-based server is more powerful than a Xeon-based server (especially when running Linux). This article sums up that sentiment nicely: "It's really hard not to be charmed by AMD, especially when you see the performance of a decked out Opteron-based server compared to anything else on the market, including an XServe" [1].
*


Well I found 581,000 hosts that offer Dedicated Xeon hosting, and only 215,000. This supports my post.

Most Xeon servers are less than a Opteron server anyway. $249(Dual Processor) a month HP Proliant Xeon Server, and $289(Dual) a month for a HP Proliant Single or Dual Opteron. Info from Voxrox.

Dual Xeon
2x 2.4GHz Hyperthreading
160 GB HDD (2 x 80)
1 GB RAM
1200 GB Bandwidth
$249 /month

Dual Opteron
2x 242 CPU (1.6GHz) (1MB cache)
80GB 7200RPM HDD
1GB ECC RAM
1200 GB Bandwidth
$289 /month

Xeon Hosting (581,000 Results)

Opteron (215,000 Results)
 
*mipadi*
post Jul 25 2005, 10:57 PM
Post #19





Guest






"The Opteron is paying off. According to Mercury Research, AMD's Opteron managed to climb up to 11.1 percent of x86 server CPU sales in the second quarter of this year. The previous quarter, which was not weak by AMD's standards, was 7.4 percent. It's not a coincidence that Intel is pushing hard to get the dual-core Xeons out the door before the close of 2005. Originally, they were scheduled as late as 2Q 2006, but the momentum behind the Opteron is nothing to scoff at, and Intel knows it. Rumor on the street is that there's more than one OEM out there worried about gains made by the Opteron. For Intel-only shops such as Dell, it's tough to see one cut out of a tenth of the market.

"And let's keep in mind that, for the most part, AMD is new to the server arena. The Opteron was AMD's first server/workstation CPU, and in just two and half years, they've gone from effectively zero percent up to 11 percent.

"Looking ahead, Opteron's future is bright, if not a little strange. Sun's executive vice president of the scalable systems told reporters that the company is going to work with AMD on Opteron development, but so far no specifics have been mentioned. Sun certainly is a forerunner in championing the Opteron, and the company obvious has extensive CPU design experience themselves." [1]

Again, I note that Intel might have more market share, but more market share != better. And, as noted, the Opteron's market share is steadily climbing. Part of Intel's success is due to the fact that is has more leverage in the marketplace, but that could change, and it is not a good indicator of what is technologically better, just what can be marketed better.
 
elmogurly
post Jul 26 2005, 01:32 AM
Post #20


GREEENROCKS
******

Group: Member
Posts: 1,393
Joined: Apr 2004
Member No: 10,624



lol my iMac is..

Processor 1.8 GHz PowerPC G5
Memory 256 MB DDR SDRAM

and i have no clue what this means.. sad.gif
 
artislife90
post Jul 26 2005, 07:01 AM
Post #21


What?
*****

Group: Member
Posts: 709
Joined: Jan 2005
Member No: 92,823



My beloved Imac is..

Power PC g5 2.0
20" Monitor
512 MB DRR SDRAM


I love my Imac. Its totally awsome.
 
willyam
post Jul 26 2005, 01:48 PM
Post #22


Senior Member
****

Group: Member
Posts: 152
Joined: Jun 2004
Member No: 24,499



Compaq Presario 900
Mobile AMD Athlon XP 1500+
1.33 GHz
512 MB of RAM
27.9 GB hard drive
Windows XP Pro

Compaq Presario 2100
Mobile Intel Celeron CPU 2.40GHz
2.39 GHz
256 MB of RAM
27.9 GB hard drive
Windows XP Pro
 
medic
post Jul 26 2005, 04:59 PM
Post #23


Seoul Rocks!
*****

Group: Member
Posts: 936
Joined: Jun 2005
Member No: 155,811



 
*mipadi*
post Jul 26 2005, 08:04 PM
Post #24





Guest






You know, medic, the only people who are bigger assholes than self-righteous Mac users, are self-righteous PC users who have to go out of their away to attack people based on their choice of a computer.

Get a life. It's just a computer, man. Who cares what other people use? If you're happy with what you use, why insult others for their choice? So a guy says he loves his iMac because it's awesome--how the f**k does that affect you?

It's one thing to get into a friendly debate, but it's annoying when people--on both sides of the fence--are total assholes about it.
 
medic
post Jul 27 2005, 03:02 PM
Post #25


Seoul Rocks!
*****

Group: Member
Posts: 936
Joined: Jun 2005
Member No: 155,811



I posted that image because almost every topic I have been too where a person is asking for help, he would post something along the lines of GET A MAC AND IT WONT HAPPEN AGAIN!, hmmm.....

And as far as I'm concerned I don't give a f**k what you think. I have a life, I have a job, I have a car, and I have friends. (Not saying that you dont) I am in Russia on vacation for gods sake, I have a life. I happened to like that picture, so what, as long as I follow the forum rules, and guidelines I can post what ever I want. Your opinion, or what you have to say is useless to me.

That is all.
 

2 Pages V   1 2 >
Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members: