the day after tomorrow or war of the worlds? |
  |
| *anubis* |
 Jul 19 2005, 03:18 PM
Post
#26
|
|
Guest  |
QUOTE(sprinkle-the-stars @ Jul 19 2005, 2:04 PM) *sigh* Yes another reason I get to bitch. Ok. They were running away from THE EYE OF THE STORM. There were like these giant Ice storms that were like hurricane's on land. The EYE was the COLDEST PART and THAT WAS WHY they were running. They didn't stop it by the door. YES they shut the door but it still came in and covered the walls. My god. You can join the party of stupid people. :D  what she said  go die veve  watch the movie clearly before you bitch at us.por favor. 
|
|
|
|
|
Jul 19 2005, 03:30 PM
Post
#27
|
|
 show me a garden thats bursting to life  Group: Staff Alumni Posts: 12,303 Joined: Mar 2005 Member No: 115,987 |
This is hilarious. OMG! Anubis, we didn't bitch about War of the worlds!
|
|
|
|
|
Jul 19 2005, 03:32 PM
Post
#28
|
|
|
Good-Bye. Group: Member Posts: 2,100 Joined: Jun 2005 Member No: 161,149 |
I only watch WOTW cause my mom wanted to watch it
 TDAT was sp better
|
|
|
|
|
Jul 19 2005, 03:55 PM
Post
#29
|
|
 wanderlust personified. Group: Official Designer Posts: 7,515 Joined: Jan 2004 Member No: 797 |
I enjoyed WOTW more than TDAT. It was just more exciting for me.
|
|
|
|
|
Jul 19 2005, 04:05 PM
Post
#30
|
|
 TOISU!! Group: Member Posts: 1,996 Joined: Jan 2005 Member No: 92,516 |
I liked War of the Worlds better because come on now. People getting vaporized or whatever by laser beams from aliens and having their blood sucked out of their body by big machines?!
Whoa. I liked The Day After Tomorrow too though. |
|
|
|
|
Jul 19 2005, 04:17 PM
Post
#31
|
|
 Senior Member Group: Member Posts: 94 Joined: May 2005 Member No: 143,991 |
i like war of the worlds better than the day after tomarrow even though war of the worlds is complety sceince sci-fi and besides its the only one of them i saw
|
|
|
|
|
Jul 19 2005, 05:07 PM
Post
#32
|
|
|
resident high-five'r Group: Member Posts: 316 Joined: Jul 2004 Member No: 29,585 |
It being the "eye of the storm" has nothing to do with what I was talking about.
The concept of running away from COLD is outlandish. Are you saying that someone running away from a cold wind is realistic? You can outrun a cold wind? Wow yea thats realistic. And are you saying that closing a door can stop the cold from reaching you? I KNOW the cold froze the door and everything around it. So does that make it just stop and not reach you? Is the fire going to protect you? God read my post. |
|
|
|
|
Jul 19 2005, 07:06 PM
Post
#33
|
|
|
show me a garden thats bursting to life Group: Staff Alumni Posts: 12,303 Joined: Mar 2005 Member No: 115,987 |
Alright I rewatched the movie so now i really can debate this crap. I even have 2 pages of notes to back me up.
QUOTE It being the "eye of the storm" has nothing to do with what I was talking about. The concept of running away from COLD is outlandish. Are you saying that someone running away from a cold wind is realistic? You can outrun a cold wind? Wow yea thats realistic. And are you saying that closing a door can stop the cold from reaching you? I KNOW the cold froze the door and everything around it. So does that make it just stop and not reach you? Is the fire going to protect you? God read my post. You are an arrogant SOB. How DARE you say "God read my post" WHEN MINE ANSWERED THE SAME CRAP YOU ARE RESTATING. Did you even READ WHAT I SAID? I NEVER said that a door could stop the cold. In fact I said it still came in and froze the walls. They BURN CHAIRS! [wood]. In fact i said THIS IF YOU READ QUOTE YES they shut the door but it still came in and covered the walls. My god. Even ANUBIS said I WAS RIGHT. *sigh* You can outrun that eye. The storm was moving slowly. and they weren't far from the library. Gees. WATCH THE MOVIE and then you can come back and bitch at me ----- Alright. Now i see where you got the -150. The Fuel in the planes will freeze @ that tempurate. But did you also take into account that these are sinulated walls? small room but with a fire as well. I still understand your point, Anubis. |
|
|
|
| *anubis* |
Jul 19 2005, 10:13 PM
Post
#34
|
|
Guest |
lol.
i'm glad you researched and took notes to prove a point.
|
|
|
|
|
Jul 19 2005, 10:22 PM
Post
#35
|
|
 The Noob Group: Member Posts: 575 Joined: Jul 2005 Member No: 169,647 |
i never saw war of the worlds so i wouldnt noe
|
|
|
|
|
Jul 19 2005, 10:40 PM
Post
#36
|
|
 My name's Katt. Nice to meet you! Group: Member Posts: 3,826 Joined: Jan 2005 Member No: 93,674 |
I saw niether, but I was talking about it one day and we came up with a few flaws in War of the Worlds which I've now concluded to be a very very bad movie...
1) They said the aliens were planning this attack for a million years, but a million years ago, there were no humans. They wouldn't need to these superior intelligence mechanisms to fight off dinosaurs and mammoths... 2) The 'robot vehicles' have 3 legs. If they were so smart, why would they have done that? Why would they have 3 legs and not 4 like every other stable organism on earth? Or 2, even? Why 3, so someone can chop off one and leave you defenseless? 3) They said the vehicles were hidden underground for a million years. Now, do you think after so long, someone would discover them? Subways, drills, finding oil? Don't you think, once in the centuries humans existed, someone would find these machines hidden underground? 4) Why is Dakota Fanning in the movie? She serves absolutely no purpose and would rather stare and scream than run for her life. That's just to name a few. So I voted Day After Tomorrow. 
|
|
|
|
|
Jul 19 2005, 10:42 PM
Post
#37
|
|
 not da vinci's mona lisa <3 Group: Member Posts: 644 Joined: Aug 2004 Member No: 39,781 |
didn't seee either oO haha
|
|
|
|
|
Jul 19 2005, 11:21 PM
Post
#38
|
|
 biglamchops Group: Member Posts: 262 Joined: Jun 2005 Member No: 149,977 |
war of the worlds sucked! the effects were cool..but the ending was soo crap! WTF!?
|
|
|
|
|
Jul 19 2005, 11:55 PM
Post
#39
|
|
|
show me a garden thats bursting to life Group: Staff Alumni Posts: 12,303 Joined: Mar 2005 Member No: 115,987 |
Yes, i Get to bitch about war of the worlds. God this is SO much fun.
QUOTE 1) They said the aliens were planning this attack for a million years, but a million years ago, there were no humans. They wouldn't need to these superior intelligence mechanisms to fight off dinosaurs and mammoths... 2) The 'robot vehicles' have 3 legs. If they were so smart, why would they have done that? Why would they have 3 legs and not 4 like every other stable organism on earth? Or 2, even? Why 3, so someone can chop off one and leave you defenseless? 3) They said the vehicles were hidden underground for a million years. Now, do you think after so long, someone would discover them? Subways, drills, finding oil? Don't you think, once in the centuries humans existed, someone would find these machines hidden underground? 4) Why is Dakota Fanning in the movie? She serves absolutely no purpose and would rather stare and scream than run for her life. 1- That's debateable. No one knows for sure. 2- they have a 3 fetish? Why not? 3's definately cooler than 4 3- The aliens RODE THE LIGHTNING down and their vehicles were in the ground. Remember when Tom was with that news lady at the plane crash? She showed him footage of that. 4- Purpose? Well, i'm sure you don't deserve a purpose then as being someone's daughter. Well hot damn i'm sure i dont either then. It's the robbie feller you gotta wonder about... oh and anubis, I wouldn't remember a single thing if i didn't take notes |
|
|
|
| *RiC3xBoy* |
Jul 20 2005, 12:06 AM
Post
#40
|
|
Guest |
QUOTE(AkaRyux @ Jul 19 2005, 8:40 PM) I saw niether, but I was talking about it one day and we came up with a few flaws in War of the Worlds which I've now concluded to be a very very bad movie... 1) They said the aliens were planning this attack for a million years, but a million years ago, there were no humans. They wouldn't need to these superior intelligence mechanisms to fight off dinosaurs and mammoths... 2) The 'robot vehicles' have 3 legs. If they were so smart, why would they have done that? Why would they have 3 legs and not 4 like every other stable organism on earth? Or 2, even? Why 3, so someone can chop off one and leave you defenseless? 3) They said the vehicles were hidden underground for a million years. Now, do you think after so long, someone would discover them? Subways, drills, finding oil? Don't you think, once in the centuries humans existed, someone would find these machines hidden underground? 4) Why is Dakota Fanning in the movie? She serves absolutely no purpose and would rather stare and scream than run for her life. That's just to name a few. So I voted Day After Tomorrow. 1. A million years was probably an exaggeration. Also, a million years was not confirmed. 2. Easy, 3 is less then 4 therefore you save more metal for other robots. Not to mention that their technology would make their robots far superior to ours. Heck, they probably have a strong enough metal to make titanium look like jello. 3. If the government can cover up assassinations, random bombing, espionage, secret groups, and etc...why not this? 4. This is a movie, not a documentary. The movie was just to tell a story not explain what happens if aliens really came. |
|
|
|
|
Jul 20 2005, 12:10 AM
Post
#41
|
|
 Too slow. Group: Member Posts: 2,730 Joined: Mar 2005 Member No: 108,320 |
I liked The day after tomorrow better. IMO War of the worlds didn't have a good ending, at all.
|
|
|
|
|
Jul 20 2005, 12:14 AM
Post
#42
|
|
 No Day But Today. Group: Member Posts: 1,405 Joined: Feb 2005 Member No: 99,184 |
I chose Day After Tomorrow because I haven't seen War of the Worlds and Jake Gyllenhaal is in Day After Tomorrow
|
|
|
|
| *anubis* |
Jul 20 2005, 02:01 AM
Post
#43
|
|
Guest |
yesss... TDAT is winning
 and wow, sprinkle-the-stars... you put up one hell of a debate
|
|
|
|
|
Jul 20 2005, 02:04 AM
Post
#44
|
|
|
show me a garden thats bursting to life Group: Staff Alumni Posts: 12,303 Joined: Mar 2005 Member No: 115,987 |
He he. I like arguing. My parents dont like it..but hey..i got it from them..
I just dont like people bashing things I like. plus. I get WAY TOO defensive. My friends make me mad all the time. I voted for TDAT too, by the way. |
|
|
|
|
Jul 20 2005, 02:09 AM
Post
#45
|
|
 (′ ･ω･｀) Group: Official Designer Posts: 6,179 Joined: Dec 2004 Member No: 72,477 |
i think TDAT wouldnt really happen, its too dramatic. but iwas way better than WOTW, its stupid. so the lightning brought the aliens over? thats ridiculous. and the ending is horrible. and yes, explain "i have to do, dad" why do u have to?
|
|
|
|
|
Jul 20 2005, 02:11 AM
Post
#46
|
|
|
show me a garden thats bursting to life Group: Staff Alumni Posts: 12,303 Joined: Mar 2005 Member No: 115,987 |
What makes you think that TDAT won't happen? The whole movie was caused by global warming..and that's like the only thing politicians are bitching about. So. Hm. It may
 Plus. The Aliens caused a lightning storm and they rode the lightning down and into the ground. That's why there was no thunder. OH! TDAT has the 'I have to do this' LINE TOO! When Dennis Quaid's character decides to trek across the country to get sam. It's in there! I watched the movie and when I heard that i just cracked up. |
|
|
|
|
Jul 20 2005, 02:13 AM
Post
#47
|
|
|
(′ ･ω･｀) Group: Official Designer Posts: 6,179 Joined: Dec 2004 Member No: 72,477 |
i wont in 2 days. well..i have to say going back for his son is ridiculous.
|
|
|
|
|
Jul 20 2005, 02:14 AM
Post
#48
|
|
|
show me a garden thats bursting to life Group: Staff Alumni Posts: 12,303 Joined: Mar 2005 Member No: 115,987 |
Not really. Father son relationship. He had to do it. Especially with his ex-wife there.
and the movie was based on a 6-8 DAYS thing. not 2 days. the earth in unpredictable. It could. But i'm no scientist.. |
|
|
|
|
Jul 20 2005, 02:16 AM
Post
#49
|
|
|
(′ ･ω･｀) Group: Official Designer Posts: 6,179 Joined: Dec 2004 Member No: 72,477 |
It cant happen in 6-8 days then. The whole thing can happen, but it would stretch out to millions of years.
|
|
|
|
|
Jul 20 2005, 02:17 AM
Post
#50
|
|
|
show me a garden thats bursting to life Group: Staff Alumni Posts: 12,303 Joined: Mar 2005 Member No: 115,987 |
Uh noooo....
Damn. No use google-ing this. Alright. I had to go get my notes that i took. Ok. These were taken from the movie so. Yea. Global warming caused the climate shift that occured 10,000 years ago caused the ice age. That lasted 2 centured. With the polar ice camps melting into the NAC [ North atlantic current] getting mixed with fresh waterfrom the polar caps you hit desalinization, which means the Atmosphere gets messed up. The giant ice storms that occured, the air was being pulled down from the upper troposhere [sp?] and mixing with the warm causing extreme cold. |
|
|
|
|
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members: