Log In · Register

 
5 Pages V  < 1 2 3 4 5 >  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
The Da Vinci Code Movie, Out in 2006
biglamchops
post Jul 11 2005, 04:52 PM
Post #51


biglamchops
****

Group: Member
Posts: 262
Joined: Jun 2005
Member No: 149,977



whoa! da vinci's code is getting so big now..... I hope they do the book justice.
 
kondwanii
post Jul 11 2005, 09:12 PM
Post #52


Newbie
*

Group: Member
Posts: 9
Joined: Jul 2005
Member No: 169,312



I'm looking forward into see this movie. In class me and my other classmates watched the trailer. It looks interesting from the trailer.
 
ichigofan
post Jul 12 2005, 12:03 AM
Post #53


Senior Member
******

Group: Member
Posts: 1,098
Joined: May 2005
Member No: 143,687



cant wait to see it the book was awesome they shouldve cast sean connery or pierce brosnan [sp?] as langdon
 
gotahemmi55
post Jul 12 2005, 01:36 AM
Post #54


Rock Music Enthusiast
*****

Group: Member
Posts: 430
Joined: Jun 2005
Member No: 160,803



beckensale would be good, but I don't think they have to do much to make this an amazing movie

it was an incredible book all by itself, I hope they don't change anything or leave anything out (even though they'll have to for time constraints)

but I'll definitely go see it the weekend it comes out next year
 
SillyCourtney
post Jul 12 2005, 08:14 AM
Post #55


Queen of Random Information
*****

Group: Member
Posts: 825
Joined: Jun 2005
Member No: 157,057



I loved the book, but I do hope the movie does it justice. As this was my second favorite book of all time, I'm going to be pretty angry if the movie is all screwed up and if they change a lot of stuff in the movie that's not supposed to be there.
 
PurchasedRebelli...
post Jul 13 2005, 04:23 PM
Post #56


Senior Member
*****

Group: Member
Posts: 833
Joined: Oct 2004
Member No: 57,463



QUOTE(ichigofan @ Jul 12 2005, 12:03 AM)
cant wait to see it the book was awesome they shouldve cast sean connery or pierce brosnan [sp?] as langdon
*

Sean Connery would have been WAY too old for the part. Even Tom Hanks is stretching it.
 
hall0w
post Jul 13 2005, 11:20 PM
Post #57


The Noob
*****

Group: Member
Posts: 575
Joined: Jul 2005
Member No: 169,647



oo i wanna watch this movie... i kind of liked the book so mayb ill like the movie better happy.gif
 
PurchasedRebelli...
post Jul 14 2005, 02:39 AM
Post #58


Senior Member
*****

Group: Member
Posts: 833
Joined: Oct 2004
Member No: 57,463



I think I'd enjoy the movie. Other than Tom Hanks, I think they did a perfect job casting the others.

Ian McKellan as Sir Leigh Teabing
Alfred Molina as Bishop Aringarosa
Jean Reno as Bezu Fache
Paul Bettany as Silas

If you want to watch the teaser trailer, go here: http://www.apple.com/trailers/sony_pictures/da_vinci_code/
 
quyen101
post Jul 14 2005, 04:25 PM
Post #59


Member
**

Group: Member
Posts: 19
Joined: Feb 2005
Member No: 99,858



Never read the book, but heard the book was really good. Can't wait for the movie.
 
SarahxJoy
post May 19 2006, 04:27 PM
Post #60


What the fack.
*******

Group: Official Member
Posts: 6,164
Joined: Mar 2004
Member No: 8,519



I'm still waiting for my dad to give me the book, so I haven't read it yet. stubborn.gif

BUT. I'm going today to watch "The Da Vinci Code". happy.gif happy.gif
 
Rampage
post May 19 2006, 04:30 PM
Post #61


cb²
****

Group: Member
Posts: 115
Joined: Apr 2006
Member No: 393,653



I loved the book, but the movie was BORING.
 
JumpforJoy
post May 19 2006, 04:54 PM
Post #62


Senior Member
*****

Group: Member
Posts: 421
Joined: Jan 2006
Member No: 362,920



QUOTE(Rampage @ May 19 2006, 5:30 PM) *
I loved the book, but the movie was BORING.

It's gotten a lot of bad reviews... especially from the critics at Cannes... and it's rating on Rotten Tomatoes isn't so good.

But, I've been waiting almost 2 years and bad reviews aren't going to stop me from seeing this! Hahaha. :)
 
SarahxJoy
post May 19 2006, 04:56 PM
Post #63


What the fack.
*******

Group: Official Member
Posts: 6,164
Joined: Mar 2004
Member No: 8,519



^True that.
 
NoSex
post May 19 2006, 04:59 PM
Post #64


in the reverb chamber.
*******

Group: Staff Alumni
Posts: 4,022
Joined: Nov 2005
Member No: 300,308



Ron Howard, eh. This just looks plain old lame.
Not interested in the least.
 
*I Shot JFK*
post May 19 2006, 05:24 PM
Post #65





Guest






friend saw it, she said it was average.

which was to be expected. really.
 
JumpforJoy
post May 19 2006, 05:44 PM
Post #66


Senior Member
*****

Group: Member
Posts: 421
Joined: Jan 2006
Member No: 362,920



I wanted to see it this morning but the earliest showing was at like, 11:45 at a theater half an hour away and my bf goes to work at like, 2... :( And he gets out at like, 11:30 and latest showing is at 11:45. BOOOO. So I'm going to have to wait until tomorrow night to see it. :(
 
Yentot
post May 19 2006, 06:53 PM
Post #67


D:
****

Group: Member
Posts: 104
Joined: Apr 2006
Member No: 392,233



It doesn't interest me. And the fact that Tom Hanks played the main role...I just don't know =/
 
silver-rain
post May 19 2006, 08:12 PM
Post #68


hi. call me linda.
*******

Group: Official Member
Posts: 8,187
Joined: Feb 2004
Member No: 3,475



Eh, I kinda liked it. Some of it was too long, but overall I felt it was a good movie. Not what I was expecting, but not too bad either.
 
*xcaitlinx*
post May 19 2006, 08:15 PM
Post #69





Guest






i heard that it sucked so much that people were actually LAUGHING at tom hanks...and walked out of the theater.
 
marzipan
post May 19 2006, 08:17 PM
Post #70


Krista.
*******

Group: Official Member
Posts: 4,380
Joined: Apr 2006
Member No: 391,319



i've never read the book, but i heard the movie sucked.
 
*FreeStickers*
post May 19 2006, 09:36 PM
Post #71





Guest






It got a lot of bad reviews, but I actually enjoyed it. I enjoyed the movie, but Tom Hanks sucks. really. I miss the old Tom Hanks.

There were protesters and all sorts of excitement!
 
freeflow
post May 19 2006, 09:36 PM
Post #72


t-t-t-toyaaa
********

Group: Official Member
Posts: 19,821
Joined: Apr 2004
Member No: 11,270



I liked it but if you read the book you can tell all the parts they changed and added on to. I thought it was alright. But tom hanks should not have played in the movie. Personally I think he didn't "fit".
 
AngryBaby
post May 19 2006, 09:46 PM
Post #73


L!ckitySplit
*******

Group: Member
Posts: 4,325
Joined: Apr 2005
Member No: 129,329



i havent seen it yet, probably see it tomorrow,

but what the hell did Tom Hanks do wrong? i wonder.
personally i think he is a better and definately more seasoned actor than "Hugh Grant or Pierce Brosnan" and definatley brought more credibility to the movie with his name on it.

but we shall see.
 
SarahxJoy
post May 19 2006, 10:41 PM
Post #74


What the fack.
*******

Group: Official Member
Posts: 6,164
Joined: Mar 2004
Member No: 8,519



Just got back a little while ago from seeing it.
My dad read the book, and he said he prefers that rather than the movie, because Ron Howard isn't much of an action movie director.

But IMO, I think it was more intended to be a mystery type of film, rather than action. Although, those two things do usually coincide with one another.

I loved it though. I found it suspenseful and there were quite a few parts that made me jump. sweating.gif Very mind-stimulating, I think. _smile.gif
 
Saeglopur
post May 20 2006, 12:11 AM
Post #75


Day's Nearly Over
*******

Group: Staff Alumni
Posts: 4,553
Joined: Aug 2004
Member No: 45,183



Just got back from a late showing...
It was pretty good. I half-slept through the violent parts (I felt people jump near me)...

And... the beginning sequence scared the crap out of me.
 

5 Pages V  < 1 2 3 4 5 >
Reply to this topicStart new topic
5 User(s) are reading this topic (5 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members: