Democracy & Strict Separation of Church and State |
Here are the general forum rules that you must follow before you start any debate topics. Please make sure you've read and followed all directions.
Democracy & Strict Separation of Church and State |
*Kathleen* |
![]()
Post
#1
|
Guest ![]() |
Resolved: Democracy is best served with a strict separation of church and state.
Okay...now...just post about what you believe in. I need some practice for the next two months' LD debate. |
|
|
![]() |
![]()
Post
#2
|
|
![]() Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Member Posts: 189 Joined: Nov 2004 Member No: 63,312 ![]() |
We could just say to continue on as we are now- I would think that most debaters would agree that the US is the best example of a democracy out there.. so a judge probably wouldn't object bringing it into a round.. anyway
Right now the US obviously does not have strict separation of church and state (faith-based initiatives, and so forth) and it is the best example of a democracy. this is deviating into policy a bit i suppose, but why not continue on as we are now? i don't think any religious minorities feel violated currently. and the constitution was actually created to keep the government out of the church, not religion out of government. (your thomas jefferson quote agrees with this). most of our founding fathers were christian, and there were many obvious religious influences- references to God, dating of documents as "In the Year of Our Lord, yadadadada" and so on. they didn't object religion influencing government- all they objected to was government interfering with religion. so the statement that strict separation is "not allowing religion to influence the state, without exception" and justifying it with quotes from the founding fathers about separation of church and state wouldn't be accurate. (i think someone did that.. earlier in this thread..) ok yea, sorry about the incoherency. a bit rushed. thx btw. |
|
|
![]() ![]() |