Democracy & Strict Separation of Church and State |
Here are the general forum rules that you must follow before you start any debate topics. Please make sure you've read and followed all directions.
Democracy & Strict Separation of Church and State |
*Kathleen* |
![]()
Post
#1
|
Guest ![]() |
Resolved: Democracy is best served with a strict separation of church and state.
Okay...now...just post about what you believe in. I need some practice for the next two months' LD debate. |
|
|
![]() |
![]()
Post
#2
|
|
![]() Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Member Posts: 189 Joined: Nov 2004 Member No: 63,312 ![]() |
ohhh, gotcha.
I think that most people would agree that strict separation of church and state means not letting the church influence the state, without exception. Here is the exception: The people voting to merge the church with the state. Under the affirmative, you would be forcing the strict separation of church and state, therefore denying the people their decision. Wouldn't this go against all the ideals of democracy? So, in effect, democracy will be ruined with strict separation of church and state. Also, the neg could push for moderate separation of church and state, rather than strict- not a complete merger, but enough separation that allows every religion to do its own thing. And you don't say anything to prove that religion into the state is a bad thing- neg could say that religion brings morals, which equals better legislative decisions. btw, are you in debate? (squad?) |
|
|
![]() ![]() |