Democracy & Strict Separation of Church and State |
Here are the general forum rules that you must follow before you start any debate topics. Please make sure you've read and followed all directions.
Democracy & Strict Separation of Church and State |
*Kathleen* |
![]()
Post
#1
|
Guest ![]() |
Resolved: Democracy is best served with a strict separation of church and state.
Okay...now...just post about what you believe in. I need some practice for the next two months' LD debate. |
|
|
![]() |
![]()
Post
#2
|
|
![]() Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Member Posts: 189 Joined: Nov 2004 Member No: 63,312 ![]() |
Since I find it annoying and unnecessarily aggressive when people go through and quote each part of someone's post to argue against it, I'll just outline my main points:
1) Yes, I am using a contemporary definition, which in my view is more valid than an antiquated definition of requiring "direct" democracy- however, I have not modified it in any way to make the phrase "The United States is a democracy" correct. That is simply the official definition of democracy according to the American Heritage Dictionary. 2) The Pledge of Allegiance is symbolic. You can't use the Pledge of Allegiance to define a whole nation's government. And like I said, a democracy is a republic. It's just a more specific term. 3) You said it. Democracy and republic aren't mutually exclusive. And if municipal governments can be democracies, why not national governments? Don't they both vote through a system of representatives? What's preventing a national government from being a democracy when it operates on essentially the same system as a municipal government, only on a larger scale? You'll have to explain this argument more, because I don't understand where you're coming from on this. btw- this is turning out to be quite an interesting and enjoyable debate. i never thought online debates could be like this, and I'm coming up with some cool new ideas for my cases. Thanks! ![]() |
|
|
![]() ![]() |