Democracy & Strict Separation of Church and State |
Here are the general forum rules that you must follow before you start any debate topics. Please make sure you've read and followed all directions.
Democracy & Strict Separation of Church and State |
*Kathleen* |
![]()
Post
#1
|
Guest ![]() |
Resolved: Democracy is best served with a strict separation of church and state.
Okay...now...just post about what you believe in. I need some practice for the next two months' LD debate. |
|
|
![]() |
![]()
Post
#2
|
|
![]() Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Member Posts: 189 Joined: Nov 2004 Member No: 63,312 ![]() |
hey.. i have to admit that I haven't read the previous posts completely, but I just wanted to get these out before I forget.
1) remember, the resolution states "democracy" in general- therefore strictly using the US constitution and the United States isn't necessarily resolutional. There are many democracies that do not follow the US Constitution. So you can't necessarily use that as a basis off of which to measure democracy. 2) the negative could also argue that democracy is BEST served by something other than strict separation of church and state- voting, or homeland security, for example. 3) i liked this argument and I hope this'll help people with cases: (this is neg btw) basic connotations: democracy- majority rule. voting- a person influencing the state. strict separation- not letting the church influence the state. (to clarify the following argument. most affs will agree with these definitions.) therefore, affirming this topic means that the affirmative would be taking away the right to vote from members of churches, because they would use their religion in their voting decisions, making them influence the state with their religion. so in order to achieve a strict separation of church and state, you must take churchgoers' right to vote away from them to prevent the church from influencing the state. and of course taking away the right to vote obviously does not best serve democracy. also, democracy means majority rule, correct? what if the majority votes to merge the church with the state? the affirmative would be hindering democracy by preventing the majority from accomplishing their decision. yeah, so i hope that helped those who need cases. sorry that it's mostly neg, but the aff seems pretty straightforward. good luck on your tournaments everyone. :) ooh. and last weekend i got 1st place speaker in CLD. harr. ![]() |
|
|
![]() ![]() |