Good Intentions, -i guess about hitler- |
Debate Rules
Here are the general forum rules that you must follow before you start any debate topics. Please make sure you've read and followed all directions.
- Topics are not to bash others.
- Immature behaviors/comments will not be tolerated.
- Please remember, not everyone thinks like you. People have different ways of thinking and different perspectives. Let's respect each other's thoughts and responses.
- PLEASE, search before making new topics--especially popular topics like "God" and "Abortion" etc.
- PLEASE, read through the thread or at least a couple pages before posting. We have to maintain a certain level of maturity in here.
 Jan 16 2005, 03:28 AM
Post
#1
|
|
 dripping destruction  Group: Staff Alumni Posts: 7,282 Joined: Jun 2004 Member No: 21,929  |
a debate spawned in lounge.
hitler's intentions - were they good? and also what do good intentions count for. alright: my post about hitler. hitler was trying to boost the economy of germany. war is good for economy. of course, taking over europe is good too. Hitler's intentions were not to wipe out the jews. it was just politically convenient to blame them for gemany's problems. They had no one to really stand up for them. easy targets, minorities. hitler had good intentions- to restore germany to it's former glory. germany was great before WWI, but when they lost the british and the french and the americans (but mostly the french) taxed the germans soo much their economy was going to bomb. hitler had good intentions- but he useed bad ways to furfill them. blaming jews, trying to take over europe, etc. but he still had good intentions. which brings us to good intentions- good intentions are never enough. good actions are needed. |
|
|
|
 |
Replies
|
Jan 16 2005, 07:02 AM
Post
#2
|
|
 High Voltage!∞ Group: Official Member Posts: 4,728 Joined: Jul 2004 Member No: 29,157 |
Hitler, I think didn't have exactly "good" intentions. I mean, explain to me how the war was good for the economy? Have you read books about how horrible the conditions were? Mothers, children, husbands, everyone of different races, especially the Jews were packed in crates [yes, crates] on trains to get to camps. If someone died they'd just throw them out. They had to stand in rooms naked, NAKED waiting for hours to get NUMBERS and LETTER as identification. Many people forgot what they're NAMES were. Tell me this, how was all of that torture, and embarrasement, good for the economy?
|
|
|
|
Posts in this topic
sadolakced acid Good Intentions Jan 16 2005, 03:28 AM
jennypie how is war good for economy? it was the war in the... Jan 16 2005, 03:48 AM sadolakced acid notice tho everything you said was things he did ... Jan 16 2005, 03:56 AM
jennypie QUOTE(sadolakced acid @ Jan 16 2005, 3:56 AM)... Jan 16 2005, 04:04 AM sadolakced acid bleh. i'm not saying hitler was good. i... Jan 16 2005, 07:56 PM Sumiaki I think Hitler had good intentions, just his tacti... Jan 17 2005, 12:05 AM sadolakced acid in the end the north also used a war of atrictian ... Jan 17 2005, 01:10 AM iiiiiiiYON EVEN iF THE iNTENTiONS ARE GOOD, iF THE RESULT iS ... Jan 17 2005, 02:08 AM bad_girl QUOTEwar is good for economy because you effectivl... Jan 17 2005, 07:01 AM dahding sure, lets all murder millions of jews to boost ou... Jan 17 2005, 09:10 AM Spirited Away I fear a lot of you didn't read into context a... Jan 17 2005, 01:28 PM sadolakced acid Yes, hitler was not good.
yes, almost everythin... Jan 17 2005, 01:49 PM tofuburger no. hitler was evil. Jan 20 2005, 11:42 AM krnxswat QUOTE(tofuburger @ Jan 20 2005, 11:42 AM)no. ... Jan 20 2005, 03:13 PM |
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members: