ipods, there everywhere Options

[FiendAngelical]

lately I see am ipod everywhere I go... how about you people?

[sadolakced acid]

1. no
2. no
3. as far as i know, yes, imac = apple = ipod, all the same company if u didn't already realized.

lemme tell u something, all the players currently out there, i.e. "Iriver", "creative"...etc. are all copying the look of an ipod.  i dun see the point to argue.
and btw, just a point of interest, maybe im really too miserable to know.  tell me something will u? wat brand before ipod can make their way to the top selling mp3 player? and with no doubt, a 5 years old kid can operate an ipod.
what im talking abt, is the design. not the "i" part.  lmao

iriver was founded before the ipod was created. i get fed up when people say 'oh theyjust put an i infront of thier name to be like ipod.'

Before the ipod, there were not major MP3 players. i'm not denying that the ipod is popular. I'm saying that you can find people that belive the answer to all three questions is yes.

by the way, doesn't the ipod shuffle look like copying someone? like creative?

if 5 year olds can operate an ipod, go to ipod lounge and look at the number of people having problems. they must be really dumb then.

there were many MP3 player companies (iriver, creative, rio) around before the ipod.

iriver and creative are NOT copying ipod's look or design.

don't claim that thier MP3 players are ipod knock offs or generic ipods, because they're not.

yet people still claim that, and that's what pisses me off.