Persident Bush as Time's 'Person of the Year', what do you all think of it? |
Here are the general forum rules that you must follow before you start any debate topics. Please make sure you've read and followed all directions.
Persident Bush as Time's 'Person of the Year', what do you all think of it? |
*not_your_average* |
![]()
Post
#1
|
Guest ![]() |
This year, Time Magazine has chosen President Bush as "Person of the Year."
Do you feel he deserves that title? Why or why not? Their articles about him pose an excellent argument, but I still would like to hear your opinions. I personally am appalled, but that's just me. Sorry about the big mess-up on the name. it was supposed to be president, not 'persident.' Dang, I've edited this post 4 times in a row! |
|
|
![]() |
![]()
Post
#2
|
|
![]() crushed. ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Staff Alumni Posts: 9,432 Joined: Jun 2004 Member No: 20,026 ![]() |
QUOTE(sadolakced acid @ Dec 24 2004, 4:24 PM) i think tho, this is really crap. not because of any of bush's politics and stuff, because he didn't influence news the most... it's most likely kerry... there were tons more time issues about kerry than about bush... needless to say if kerry had won the election, and had gotten two more months of news, he would have won. it's either kerry or saddam hussein, becuase of his caputure. bush just isn't in the news that much... TRUE TRUE..WE JUST GOT THAT IN THE MAIL..I THINK IT'S IN THE TRASH.. ![]() |
|
|
![]() ![]() |