Persident Bush as Time's 'Person of the Year', what do you all think of it? |
Here are the general forum rules that you must follow before you start any debate topics. Please make sure you've read and followed all directions.
Persident Bush as Time's 'Person of the Year', what do you all think of it? |
*not_your_average* |
![]()
Post
#1
|
Guest ![]() |
This year, Time Magazine has chosen President Bush as "Person of the Year."
Do you feel he deserves that title? Why or why not? Their articles about him pose an excellent argument, but I still would like to hear your opinions. I personally am appalled, but that's just me. Sorry about the big mess-up on the name. it was supposed to be president, not 'persident.' Dang, I've edited this post 4 times in a row! |
|
|
![]() |
![]()
Post
#2
|
|
![]() dripping destruction ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Staff Alumni Posts: 7,282 Joined: Jun 2004 Member No: 21,929 ![]() |
yes, bush was quite infuential on new this year.
but year 2001, the person of the year was rudy guilliani, when it clearly should have been osama bin laden. politics does inflluence the choice. |
|
|
![]() ![]() |