killing animals for art Options

[ghjgfkgfk]

http://www.wetterlinggallery.com/archive/n...thalia_main.htm
http://www.wetterlinggallery.com/newsletter/newsletter.htm

do you think it's okay to kill animals for art?

i do not support it, but it's not different than what society already does. people kill animals for fashion. shoes, belts, coats, ect. people kill animals for meat. these things are 'okay'. not only okay, but something people want. people hunt for sport then go stuffing the bodies and heads of animals to hang them on a wall.

we don't need meat to live. we don't have to wear real fur, you could wear faux fur...none of them are necessary. you could live without meat. art isn't necessary to live. however, she could of used a different way to get her point across, such as painting,

if she killed any animal but 'cute fluffy things' would anyone even care? if she used spiders, ants, roaches, i doubt anyone would think there was even an issue.

[Kriegsgefangene]

I eat cows but I don't eat dogs/cats/etc. Even if a person display a dead cow as art, that would still be considered as sick in my eyes. Would you want someone to display your dead carcass and call it art? If YOU do want that to happen, I sure as hell don't want to see it.




So because we're "on one of the biggest mass extincitons in history" we should just go with the flow?



What if I was the animal wanting to carve you up for art. There was a human (you) there, and it has potentials to be art. I wanted to carve you for art, would I? NOOOOO, OF COURSE!!!! Because I CAN'T f**kING DO IT.

If YOU had really thinkg about it then you would have asked the question would a cat kill a human for food or for art?


Out of fairness, if an animal can't kill a human for art, humans shouldn't do it either, in my opinion.



Though they do not have the mental capacity that we have, does that mean they suffer any less than we do in pain?

"The question is not, 'Can they reason?' nor 'Can they talk?' but 'Can they suffer?"
-- Jeremy Bentham (If you don't know, he's a philosopher)


We have laws by government, and we have laws by human standard.




How about not mourning at all? Or mourning for ONE thing instead of TWO things?

What you also need to think is-

Will the world ever have the standard of no wars.

Most of that shit is going to happen one way or another.

Sort of useless arguing about it.

We can't not mourn at all.

People die, Animals die, Everything dies sometime. Why the f**k should anyone care?

I mean, come on. So what if we are killing damn animals for art. That is who ever's doings personal way to show themselves, whether you think sick or not.

Hell, we go over seas, and start bombing the hell out of civilians because some damned man wants to stop trading oil with us, be we are supposed to be 'liberating' them.


Ehh. You really have to sit down and think 'When the hell is the world going to live in peace.'

It is a damn endless waltz, the three never ending steps of War, Peace, and Evolution.

Just oppinions.

Oh.. and we should go with the flow. Wait, we already are! Bombing each other, we will destroy the world in no time