killing animals for art Options

[ghjgfkgfk]

http://www.wetterlinggallery.com/archive/n...thalia_main.htm
http://www.wetterlinggallery.com/newsletter/newsletter.htm

do you think it's okay to kill animals for art?

i do not support it, but it's not different than what society already does. people kill animals for fashion. shoes, belts, coats, ect. people kill animals for meat. these things are 'okay'. not only okay, but something people want. people hunt for sport then go stuffing the bodies and heads of animals to hang them on a wall.

we don't need meat to live. we don't have to wear real fur, you could wear faux fur...none of them are necessary. you could live without meat. art isn't necessary to live. however, she could of used a different way to get her point across, such as painting,

if she killed any animal but 'cute fluffy things' would anyone even care? if she used spiders, ants, roaches, i doubt anyone would think there was even an issue.

[sadolakced acid]

armadillos, skunks, squirrels, will eventually go extint.

this is a world where 5 years ago everyone said the population was at 6 billion, and now it's 8 billion.

the forests will be torn up. the world will destory the habitats of these animals.


those that do not go extinct will live off of us, like rats and pigeons. don't get me wrong, there probably will be zoos and nature reserves, but they won't be enough.

we are in the middle of the 6th mass extinction. the first five were caused by things like particularyly large volcanos, asteroids, etc. the sixth is cause by habitat distruction.

all animals habitats will become destoryed. and then, only the ones we need will be saved. and those are food animals.