killing animals for art Options

[ghjgfkgfk]

http://www.wetterlinggallery.com/archive/n...thalia_main.htm
http://www.wetterlinggallery.com/newsletter/newsletter.htm

do you think it's okay to kill animals for art?

i do not support it, but it's not different than what society already does. people kill animals for fashion. shoes, belts, coats, ect. people kill animals for meat. these things are 'okay'. not only okay, but something people want. people hunt for sport then go stuffing the bodies and heads of animals to hang them on a wall.

we don't need meat to live. we don't have to wear real fur, you could wear faux fur...none of them are necessary. you could live without meat. art isn't necessary to live. however, she could of used a different way to get her point across, such as painting,

if she killed any animal but 'cute fluffy things' would anyone even care? if she used spiders, ants, roaches, i doubt anyone would think there was even an issue.

[ComradeRed]

Armadillos aren't too tasty.
Skunks aren't all that tasty, either.
And the last time I checked, squirrels weren't so delicious.

As a matter of fact, I think that there are less extinct animals than animals that aren't extinct. And not all of them are part of the human food industry.

But if no one ate deer, they would start multiplying until we would have to start killing them because they'd be such a nuisance.

99% of species go extinct.

Usually, they are the more exotic species... so we don't hear about them muhc.