killing animals for art Options

[ghjgfkgfk]

http://www.wetterlinggallery.com/archive/n...thalia_main.htm
http://www.wetterlinggallery.com/newsletter/newsletter.htm

do you think it's okay to kill animals for art?

i do not support it, but it's not different than what society already does. people kill animals for fashion. shoes, belts, coats, ect. people kill animals for meat. these things are 'okay'. not only okay, but something people want. people hunt for sport then go stuffing the bodies and heads of animals to hang them on a wall.

we don't need meat to live. we don't have to wear real fur, you could wear faux fur...none of them are necessary. you could live without meat. art isn't necessary to live. however, she could of used a different way to get her point across, such as painting,

if she killed any animal but 'cute fluffy things' would anyone even care? if she used spiders, ants, roaches, i doubt anyone would think there was even an issue.

[Spirited Away]

What the heezy?

There are a lot of things that are not necessary for our own survial such as saving someone from drowning or getting help for someone who needs it. But is there anyone in the world who only live on necessities? There is more to life than that. We have morals and, with this situation, I would like to emphasize the fact that mankind has compassion. Should that compassion be limitted to love for other humans or should it covered love for nature and those who share this world with us?

Spiderman's uncle Ben said "with great powers come great responsibility". Do you not agree? Compared to animals, we have much power over them, therefore, it makes sense to say that we have some kind of responsibility towards them. Killing them and displaying their mulitated bodies for the sake of "art", or "self-expression" doesn't seem a to fit our compassionate, responsible nature.