killing animals for art Options

[ghjgfkgfk]

http://www.wetterlinggallery.com/archive/n...thalia_main.htm
http://www.wetterlinggallery.com/newsletter/newsletter.htm

do you think it's okay to kill animals for art?

i do not support it, but it's not different than what society already does. people kill animals for fashion. shoes, belts, coats, ect. people kill animals for meat. these things are 'okay'. not only okay, but something people want. people hunt for sport then go stuffing the bodies and heads of animals to hang them on a wall.

we don't need meat to live. we don't have to wear real fur, you could wear faux fur...none of them are necessary. you could live without meat. art isn't necessary to live. however, she could of used a different way to get her point across, such as painting,

if she killed any animal but 'cute fluffy things' would anyone even care? if she used spiders, ants, roaches, i doubt anyone would think there was even an issue.

[pandamonium]

^ is it necessary to have 5 pairs of shoes?

where in that 9 worded question do you get all of that SPORADIC ?

No, but I don't have 5 pairs of leather shoes. Are you saying that we shouldn't kill animals? That we should survive on tofu-burgers and soy milk until the animal population eventually and inevitably overwhelms us?

Humans were born without fur. We don't have any natural protection against harsh weather. Animals protect us from that. I wear my leather shoes because they keep my feet warm, and yes. They do look nice.

Would you rather that no one buys any leather shoes? That would be a waste of that animal. A pointless death. At least if the animal dies and its body serves a useful purpose in death, I don't see what's wrong with that.

We do have have things to keep us warm like one of our biggest organs. the epidermis and fat ... just like otters.