killing animals for art Options

[ghjgfkgfk]

http://www.wetterlinggallery.com/archive/n...thalia_main.htm
http://www.wetterlinggallery.com/newsletter/newsletter.htm

do you think it's okay to kill animals for art?

i do not support it, but it's not different than what society already does. people kill animals for fashion. shoes, belts, coats, ect. people kill animals for meat. these things are 'okay'. not only okay, but something people want. people hunt for sport then go stuffing the bodies and heads of animals to hang them on a wall.

we don't need meat to live. we don't have to wear real fur, you could wear faux fur...none of them are necessary. you could live without meat. art isn't necessary to live. however, she could of used a different way to get her point across, such as painting,

if she killed any animal but 'cute fluffy things' would anyone even care? if she used spiders, ants, roaches, i doubt anyone would think there was even an issue.

[pandamonium]

It's gross because it's obviously an animal. But that's not why I'm AGAINST it.

I'm against it because killing animals for art serves no purpose, other than decoration. Clothes and food are NECESSARY. Art is not.

ART is definately NOT a "DECORATION"

art is self expression.

let me ask you this why did you buy those leather boots?
........ its because you like them right?.. its because they look pretty right? its because it fits your style right?....

you express yourself in clothes so what you wear can also can be considered art. So the point is you bought those leather boots because they express what "you" like and who you are and those boots make "you" who you are, they make "you" unique .

so you also express art.

so that person who made those peices of art may not have done the right thing by killing those animals but they were expressing themselves.....