killing animals for art Options

[ghjgfkgfk]

http://www.wetterlinggallery.com/archive/n...thalia_main.htm
http://www.wetterlinggallery.com/newsletter/newsletter.htm

do you think it's okay to kill animals for art?

i do not support it, but it's not different than what society already does. people kill animals for fashion. shoes, belts, coats, ect. people kill animals for meat. these things are 'okay'. not only okay, but something people want. people hunt for sport then go stuffing the bodies and heads of animals to hang them on a wall.

we don't need meat to live. we don't have to wear real fur, you could wear faux fur...none of them are necessary. you could live without meat. art isn't necessary to live. however, she could of used a different way to get her point across, such as painting,

if she killed any animal but 'cute fluffy things' would anyone even care? if she used spiders, ants, roaches, i doubt anyone would think there was even an issue.

[sporadic]

and why were you arguing before that its gross to kill animals for art ????

in art you are only critizing and looking at but clothes you have the dead animals on you ... i dont see how you see it as "gross" if your wearing the same animals on your feet.

It's gross because it's obviously an animal. But that's not why I'm AGAINST it.

I'm against it because killing animals for art serves no purpose, other than decoration. Clothes and food are NECESSARY. Art is not.