killing animals for art Options

[ghjgfkgfk]

http://www.wetterlinggallery.com/archive/n...thalia_main.htm
http://www.wetterlinggallery.com/newsletter/newsletter.htm

do you think it's okay to kill animals for art?

i do not support it, but it's not different than what society already does. people kill animals for fashion. shoes, belts, coats, ect. people kill animals for meat. these things are 'okay'. not only okay, but something people want. people hunt for sport then go stuffing the bodies and heads of animals to hang them on a wall.

we don't need meat to live. we don't have to wear real fur, you could wear faux fur...none of them are necessary. you could live without meat. art isn't necessary to live. however, she could of used a different way to get her point across, such as painting,

if she killed any animal but 'cute fluffy things' would anyone even care? if she used spiders, ants, roaches, i doubt anyone would think there was even an issue.

[sadolakced acid]

1. on dead babys

don't they sometimes leave the coffins open at a funeral home so you can look at the deceaced? i know it's not the same, but you still can't ban it. if the mother decided to show her dead baby, you can't stop it. and although it should be stopped, to stop this would be to stop other art and too much... it is the sacrafice.


2. on animal rights

animals have animal rights.... they should be treated well, but not equal to humans. we should still use them for labaratory animals, we should still keep pets, eat them, use them for labor, etc.

however, thier treatment should be in a HUMANE maner- which means the person should act human.