"under God", should it be taken out?? |
Here are the general forum rules that you must follow before you start any debate topics. Please make sure you've read and followed all directions.
"under God", should it be taken out?? |
![]()
Post
#1
|
|
![]() Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Member Posts: 276 Joined: Jan 2004 Member No: 1,862 ![]() |
The case is up before the Supreme Court. So what do you think??
|
|
|
![]() |
![]()
Post
#2
|
|
Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Member Posts: 185 Joined: Feb 2004 Member No: 4,077 ![]() |
QUOTE I think it should either be takin out or the pledge become an optional thing...I mean that must be offencive to alot of ppl to have to pledge under another god....so yeah take it out besides its unconmstitutional to force religion on a group of ppl... It is by law optional. By law no teacher, principle, person can make a student or person state the pledge out of his own will. This country was founded in belief of God. Only recently have many came public in being Athiest or believing in it. The majority of people still believe in God; most people in our country belong to some form of religion. Most americans believe in God or a supreme being. Now athiests still make a very small population in this nation. Its intresting that a minority chooses to outrule the majority. It is by law that schools cant force people to say the pledge at all. THey dont have to say the pledge or they can say it and ommit the under god part themselves. What athiests are trying to do is force the deliberate removal of belief of God from our nation. This isn't about seperation of state from religion. It is the development of anti-religion by athiests. At this moment athiests arent forced to say anything or believe anything. What athiest want is to strip the oportunity to believe. Of course this is all my opinion and therefor could not be what the case is but what the case is as I percieve it. |
|
|
![]() ![]() |