Debate of VP |
Here are the general forum rules that you must follow before you start any debate topics. Please make sure you've read and followed all directions.
Debate of VP |
![]()
Post
#1
|
|
You guys are dumb. ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Member Posts: 1,252 Joined: Jun 2004 Member No: 25,094 ![]() |
Who will win? Does beauty have a chance against the beast? Will Dr. Evil bend the Ken doll over and use him like the bitch he is?
Discuss. |
|
|
![]() |
![]()
Post
#2
|
|
![]() cellar door ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Member Posts: 85 Joined: Aug 2004 Member No: 41,513 ![]() |
QUOTE(kryogenix @ Oct 7 2004, 8:40 PM) Using a grammatical error to emphasize a point isn't a good idea, especially when you insult someone in the same sentence. The fact that you did it on purpose makes it worse. The mistake muddled your message, rather than emphasized it. Okay grammar nazi. I'll remember next time so you don't have to cry about it. You still have failed to address the fact that you have no sense of humor. You're what? A junior in high shool? Look kid, you're not even legal yet. Lighten up. Turn off your computer screen every now and then. Breathe a little. Hug some trees. And I'm a she, darlin'. QUOTE(kry) Just curious, how do your looks affect your ability to win a debate? Do you make it a habit to not read the post before replying? Reread it again and come back to me. I'll make my position clear since apparently, kryogenix does not know. People are talking about this thing with a party line between their legs at all times. That's a huge f**king mistake--it always has been and it will continue to be. Cheney was better than I thought he'd be, no joke: my prediction about his heart exploding on TV didn't come true, but it would've been pretty funny. I don't think he was playing any "elder, reserved" role--I think he got f**king told a couple of times and didn't have any way to come back from it. When he was right, though, he was right (eg. Edwards' horrific Senate attendance record) and I audibly was like, "OH SHIT, DICK CHENEY. DICK CHENEY!" etc. Edwards' statistics weren't all right, which is a problem (I was yelling at the TV, "NO! NO YOU IDIOT THEY'RE GOING TO RUIN YOU!") but his message was completely on. The guy's got enormous balls to say some of the things he did during the debate, and if they get elected and follow through I'll be extremely happy. My honest opinion is that when Cheney managed to make valid points, he was great. But more often than not he seemed to choose talking about "FLIP-FLOPPING" (TM GOP2004) rather than what was just said, which allowed Edwards to smack him the f**k down. I don't know what everyone's talking about with dude losing his cool--I think that of the two, Edwards was way, way, way less angry throughout the entire thing. They'd cut to Cheney and he'd be sitting there with brimstone smoking out of his eyes, you know? Edwards dodged less and jabbed more. However, in the end, I still believed Cheney was triumphant. The problem with this forum is that the people here are either so left wing or right wing that you guys can't get past the bullshit and see a win for a win. I'm a democrat and cleary, Kerry won the first debate and Cheney won the second. And I can honestly say that without being biased. QUOTE(Retrogressive) National Boner Day: That is an awesome animation did you make it? No. My friend (WHO IS A REPUBLICAN) made it. It just goes to show that just because you're on the other side, it doesn't mean you have to masturbate furiously everytime someone cracks a joke. |
|
|
![]() ![]() |