RIAA lawsuits, Unfair, unjust, and communist. |
Here are the general forum rules that you must follow before you start any debate topics. Please make sure you've read and followed all directions.
RIAA lawsuits, Unfair, unjust, and communist. |
![]()
Post
#1
|
|
![]() Bardic Nation ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Member Posts: 1,113 Joined: Aug 2004 Member No: 38,059 ![]() |
I just did some research finally and found out that the RIAA is only sueing people who shared more than 1000 files.
I was under the impression if it was people who had a lot of music on their computer. Don't you feel a lot safer now? |
|
|
![]() |
![]()
Post
#2
|
|
![]() [[one piece :D ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Member Posts: 2,722 Joined: Jan 2004 Member No: 795 ![]() |
QUOTE(my_papaya @ Sep 14 2004, 6:38 PM) perhaps it was a weak argument, and i am fully aware that record companies take a large amount of the profit, but half the music these days is completely synthetic and so the "artists" hardly have to put forth much effort. take britney spears for example. all her new music is completely synthetic and computerized and she barely even sounds human. compare that to her older albums, and as produced as they may be, you can tell the difference between what has been processed and what she actually sang. the people who work behinds the scene are the ones who really deserve the credit, because what are singers these days beside pretty faces anyway? and ashlee simpson. have you heard her live?? ahhh!!! but so if these artist who supposedly worked so hard to put their sweat and blood into their albums can no longer profit, then they can find another way to make a living just like everyone else. the smaller, unsigned bands should be well aware that they cannot count fully on their undiscovered music to support them, and downloading my actually be a good way for them to get their music out there and noticed. the useless britney and ashlee simpson types deserve nothing more than what profit they recieve, and i would not pay anything more than the $1.99 a month my win-mx costs me to hear their over produced singing. bands with talent who deserve for people to buy their albums are less commonly found on music sharing programs and so i end up buying their cds anyway. also, half the music listening i do is while im on the computer anyway, so its far easier to have all my music in one place than to look for discs. and as good a potential idea paying for download songs is, its not practical because what if you discover the song isnt what you thought it was? or your parents wont let you pay for stuff on the internet, like mine? downloading full albums may not be right, but if you only want a few songs then its the only way to go that makes sense althought they might sing bad, but you don't really have to buy them to listen, otherword, you don't have to listen since they sing bad. well, they sing bad, but that doesn't mean that you'll have to download the songs. it's like making skins. if the skin is bad, you still can't jock, because they are not yours. - moved to debate - |
|
|
![]() ![]() |