Proof, Please read the book first Options

[ppl_love_me]

You must look at, if not read, the book called "Evolution of the Creationist" to realy argue.

The man that wrote the book was an evolutionist, untill a scholar in the colledge he was teaching at asked him to look at the topic of creation. And the research he did (originaly to prove evolution) actually only gave more evedence of creation, and he found much more!

I think the school systems are actually affending religions. In the book He points out that being an evolutionist is haveing a religion, so they are teaching blasfamy. (can't spell sry)

Also, I think scientist can only prove god exsists or he doesn't. And alot of science is ageinst the laws of god and many other religions. like the genetic experimentation on making clones, it is like trying to be god, and prove that humans can function with out him.

If you dissagree with creation. then thorouly explain to me how the parent cell came to being? and How would an animal like the Incubator Bird (look it up ppl!) evolve? and tell me some documented FACTS that has been found.

just try...

[Spirited Away]

I am not trying to argue, for you info, I simply want to know why many people belive in Evolution. including Christians.

Firstly, you're in the wrong forum if you're not here to argue.

The guy IS a christian. and yes I know there many Christian that belive in evolution. But think about this. If god created us to beleive in him with our faith. Then wouldn't he want to give us a challenge? Why would he simply hand us the information, then there would be no reason to live. we live to discover the faith inside us.

Secondly, please refrain from making the comment that there is no reason to live without God, because that is plenty ingorance in one simple sentence. Before the rise of Christianity, people can still live and prosper in happiness.

Was he Christian before being an evolutionist? If so, then what was your point? That this man proved evolution wrong?

so your saying that humans came from bacteria, which has completely different function then we do. and that we all came from animals. If that is so, then wouldn't we have a bit more "animal instinct" I have not gone threw Biology yet. So I am unaware of what the Molocule to Man thing says, but if we came from primapes, then why are there still primapes?

Hmm, ComradeRed will have to answer this for you when he is around since I lack the ability to speak coherently when it comes down to science. If he will not, then I will endeavor to do the deed.

I know that evolution says that our cultures are evolving too, but infact, they are devolving, I won't layout the full chart, but If we started out with simple languages, than how come we have languages that are mor advanced than most of todays?

Please "layout the full chart" for me as I'm having problem understanding this idea.