The Good in President Bush, I would like to know... Options

[Alpha240]

I've read many debates regarding George Bush and John Kerry. Unlike Bush, Kerry never had a chance to prove himself as a president and show the American people how he could help this country and its people. George Bush had almost 4 years now to make a difference, and in my opinion any difference he made was make our country worse than it was before. I just don't understand why people like Bush. I really don't. I've heard unrational reasons, such as "He is a Christian" and "He is a strong leader", but I have not heard any REAL reasons on why Bush is a good person/president. So pleeease... someone tell me why so many people out there like Bush.

I would like non war related reasons, because i am against the war and therefore I will disagree with almost any reason given regarding the war.
For example: if you say you like Bush because he caught Saddam Hussein, my reply would be that he had no probable cause to go after Hussein. Even if he saw him as a threat, Bush had no proof or real intelligence to have reasons to bomb Suddam's country and capture him. I also don't believe in pre-emptive attacks. I think they are extremely hypocritical and destructive.

So if anyone has any input on how Bush improved our economy, environment, societal problems, scientific and technological advances, or anything along those lines please let me know.

[pikimoo]

What do you know about Kerry and what he supports exactly, Pikimoo? From what I've speculated, he's definately no good in my book.

And not to mention that I'm one of those staunch Americans who believe that Bush should stay in office to finish what he started.

Err.. no. I don't really know anything about the president's truthfully

But I was referring to what you said.

Tell me what Kerry could've done diffently for 9/11 while remembering that Kerry supported the war.

Tell me, what would Kerry have done that would differ from Bush?

Humph, it's not so much that "so many people out there like Bush", it's more like we're seemingly choosing the lesser of two evils with logical deductions

You implied that Kerry wouldn't be any different from Bush, meaning they are equal. Then you said we're choosing 'the lesser evil'

I dunno