Global Warming is an International Issue Options

[makhussy]

Global Warming - The average facade temperature of the globe has augmented more than 1 degree Fahrenheit since 1900 and the speed of warming has been almost three folds the century long average since 1970. This increase in earth’s average temperature is called Global warming.

[sixfive]

i was driving around houston the other day and i saw some dusty van and someone had written in the dust:

"Global Warming?

Sure, Al"


Also I find it funny that there have been questions about why it's been so cold this year and scientists are saying things like "Oh... Well, there are cycles of warm and cold..."

NO f*ckING SHIT history of the earth wtf is global warming anyway

[Uronacid]

i was driving around houston the other day and i saw some dusty van and someone had written in the dust:

"Global Warming?

Sure, Al"
Also I find it funny that there have been questions about why it's been so cold this year and scientists are saying things like "Oh... Well, there are cycles of warm and cold..."

NO f*ckING SHIT history of the earth wtf is global warming anyway

Yeah, exactly. I believe there are cycles as well.

While I don't like the idea of polluting the earth, I honestly don't believe that pollution is the missing factor behind our changing climate.

I believe there are extremists who want so badly to put an end to pollution that they'll find any means to do it, and Global Warming is the vehicle that they've decided to hold on to. Whether these extremists are wrong or right is irrelevant. Everything is based on supporting evidence. None of this evidence proves the theory that pollution is the primary reason for Global Warming is fact. In fact there are many other opposing theories that are just as logical. To this day you still have to accept the theory of pollution based Global Warming on faith.

[mipadi]

I believe there are extremists who want so badly to put an end to pollution that they'll find any means to do it, and Global Warming is the vehicle that they've decided to hold on to. Whether these extremists are wrong or right is irrelevant. Everything is based on supporting evidence. None of this evidence proves the theory that pollution is the primary reason for Global Warming is fact. In fact there are many other opposing theories that are just as logical. To this day you still have to accept the theory of pollution based Global Warming on faith.

[Citation needed]

No, I'm serious. I'm not categorically stating you're wrong, but I think it's ironic that you say "everything is based on supporting evidence" in the same post in which you don't actually provide any evidence to support your claims. You also referred to Nate as a "media whore", and yet he's one of the few people in the Debate forum who still posts links to actual articles, videos, and other sources.

The Debate forum isn't a place to post what you think, it's a post to make an argument based on logic and reasoning.

I don't mean to sound harsh. Again, I'm not saying you're wrong; I'm just pointing out that you've made some dubious claims without any evidence whatsoever to support them. It's hard to respond to your claims if you're not even going to make a token effort to provide your sources for analysis.

[Uronacid]

Polution based global warming is like taking the phrase, "People who eat Cheerios are less likely to have heart deseases and certain types of cancer." and stating, "If you eat Cheerios then you're less likely to experience heart desease or certain types of cancer." It's just not true.