Layout: RaveGirl, Constructive criticism plz Rating Options

[crazy303]

This Layout was rejected because (and i quote);

*the image is clearly not well designed ;it\'s just a \"neon glow\" effect on a picture of a girl changed to red. the structure of the layout isn\'t strong either.*

first off christy, thats your opinion and it doesnt speak 4 every 1 sum ppl like simple layouts and secondly the image is NOT just a girl and a neon glow it just so happens that i made a vector design put it on a blank canvas added a girl made the boxes and then turnd it into a neon glow. as far as structure wat makes it strong eh? dnt be so uptight and mean while rejecting layouts maybe u should tell them wat u think could help fix it.

Any way here it iz if u dont agree with christy n would like this layout let me know.

click to enlarge

P.S. This post was and is not intended to bash christy n any way she has her opinion and we have ours so christy if u read this n take it badly im srry that was/is not my intentions.

Reason for edit: Use [thumb] tags for large images. -Gabrielle (Elletricity)

[heyo-captain-jac...]

It doesn't display properly in other more common (seriously, I used 1024x768 ten years ago, you should probably upgrade your monitor) resolutions because your image is too small.

Also f****t, can't do anything about the forum's censorship.

[synapse]

I can't do anything about the forum's censorship.

liar

[heyo-captain-jac...]

liar

I can circumvent it normally, but I don't have a mouse right now and I would have to click a bunch of shit to get it to work. I'm actually using a chorded keyboard right now, shit's painful.

I can't get rid of it, but I can get around it most of the time.

Edit:

Also this bothers me. f*ck, f****t, nagger, etc are all censored, but shit isn't?

Also I hate the filter for nig ger. It's like implying that african americans do nothing but nag. Where is the affirmative action?

And if nagger is censored than why aren't things like beaner schnitzel censored? I can say that offends me.