bombings on japan, were the really needed |
Here are the general forum rules that you must follow before you start any debate topics. Please make sure you've read and followed all directions.
bombings on japan, were the really needed |
![]()
Post
#1
|
|
Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Member Posts: 664 Joined: Mar 2004 Member No: 7,686 ![]() |
do u guys think the 2 bombs dropped on japan during WW2 were really needed?
i say no because they just killed innoc3nt people in those 2 citys and it left a perment mental damage on my grandma (im japanese) so what do u guys think |
|
|
![]() |
![]()
Post
#2
|
|
![]() dripping destruction ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Staff Alumni Posts: 7,282 Joined: Jun 2004 Member No: 21,929 ![]() |
the emperor tried to surrender. some people took over, saying it was cowadice. the emperor wa a living god. it was high treason. but they still did it. because he was going to surrender.
the thing is, we couldn't have waited. because, we had to strike in quick succesion for the bombs to have extreme psycological effect. by the way, the second bomb, fat man, it missed nagasaki, although not compeletly. it's about a display of power. |
|
|
![]() ![]() |