Best Linux Distro, For Personal Computer Use |
Best Linux Distro, For Personal Computer Use |
![]()
Post
#1
|
|
![]() ^_^ ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Staff Alumni Posts: 8,141 Joined: Jan 2005 Member No: 91,466 ![]() |
I've had Ubuntu and Fedora on two of my machines for a good 5 months now. Personally, I've become a huge, huge fan of Linux and I don't see myself switching back to Windows or crossing over to the dark side of Mac anytime soon (aside from government computers, of course).
Well, I just picked up Mandriva and it runs even smoother than the other distributions that I have. My mediocre Dell Insprion 6000 now operates like an XPS or Alienware computer, in terms of speed. After a few hours playing around on the terminal, I managed to install Fruity Loops 7 XXL Producer Edition as well as the racing game GRID. Everything runs smoothly. Still, I can't seem to figure out which Linux distro is the best. Each one I've acquired has been better than the one before. For the Linux users, what distros are you running on your machines? What do you personally recommend? edit: KDE is growing on me. I'm still partial to Gnome, but KDE 4.1 looks clean. |
|
|
![]() |
![]()
Post
#2
|
|
![]() /人◕‿‿◕人\ ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Official Member Posts: 8,283 Joined: Dec 2007 Member No: 602,927 ![]() |
I hate Ubuntu because it babies you, but I hate Mint because it holds your hand on the way to the bathroom and shakes the piss off your cock when you're done.
Also, here's a review on Mandriva I wrote a few months ago: Mandriva Linux was originally released by MandrakeSoft as Mandrake Linux as an easy to use and powerful Linux distribution for both those new to Linux, and powerusers. When Mandrake was released in 1998, Linux was already well known for it's stability and power, but any use of it required such extensive technical knowledge that it had no hope of becoming a mainstream operating system. MandrakeSoft saw this as an opportunity to introduce a more user-friendly distribution than ever seen in the Linux community. Pros: * Extremely fast if your computer can handle KDE 4 or Gnome. * Somewhat light (Approximately 650 Mb. That's better than Red Hat. Even Red Hat 9 from 2003 took up four times as much space) * Very user friendly, while still being powerful * Ships with Gnome or KDE4. Works flawlessly with Enlightenment, XFCE, or Fluxbox (These are the only alternatives I've tried on Mandriva.) * Will boot on literally anything. I've run it in CLI on a computer with 1 Mb RAM and a 486. * Has a free version that's as good as the enterprise version, but misses a few non-essential programs that nobody uses. * Uses RPMs, so pretty much any program will work on it. Cons: * Runs extremely slow if X is enabled on old hardware (I'm talking pre-2000 old. If you have this problem, you should be using Damn Small Linux or Puppy anyway) * Doesn't work too well with JWM, although not much does. * Default DE is KDE 4, this makes changing to a different DE or WM painful on first boot. I suggest using CLI to download another WM with urpmi before you do anything. * Slow package manager. Notes: * Has an enterprise version. * Network install isn't an option. Also Arch Linux. Use it, f****ts. |
|
|
![]() ![]() |