bombings on japan, were the really needed |
Here are the general forum rules that you must follow before you start any debate topics. Please make sure you've read and followed all directions.
bombings on japan, were the really needed |
![]()
Post
#1
|
|
Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Member Posts: 664 Joined: Mar 2004 Member No: 7,686 ![]() |
do u guys think the 2 bombs dropped on japan during WW2 were really needed?
i say no because they just killed innoc3nt people in those 2 citys and it left a perment mental damage on my grandma (im japanese) so what do u guys think |
|
|
![]() |
![]()
Post
#2
|
|
![]() Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Member Posts: 1,795 Joined: May 2004 Member No: 16,421 ![]() |
QUOTE oh, but you see. the japanese could have stopped the bombs. all they had to do was shoot down the bomber. the bomb wasn't even armed before about 2 hours before bombs away. one bomber hiroshima didn't have an air base. it was a military support area, not an are base. the japanesse were not idmediatly wounded. it was a long term wound, to prevent the japanesse from manufacturing supplies. thier air defenses were quite adequete, i tell you. Air defenses adequate.. I dont know about that.. it was over major cities.. oh well.. but anyways.. were not immediately wounded.... ??? what are you talking about? how many ppl were killed? you call that not immediately wounded? And two bombs were dropped.. why were both necessary? |
|
|
![]() ![]() |