bombings on japan, were the really needed |
Here are the general forum rules that you must follow before you start any debate topics. Please make sure you've read and followed all directions.
bombings on japan, were the really needed |
![]()
Post
#1
|
|
Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Member Posts: 664 Joined: Mar 2004 Member No: 7,686 ![]() |
do u guys think the 2 bombs dropped on japan during WW2 were really needed?
i say no because they just killed innoc3nt people in those 2 citys and it left a perment mental damage on my grandma (im japanese) so what do u guys think |
|
|
![]() |
![]()
Post
#2
|
|
![]() dripping destruction ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Staff Alumni Posts: 7,282 Joined: Jun 2004 Member No: 21,929 ![]() |
haha. i was in a hurry.
we had to sneak past thier air defenses flak cannons, zeros it's not easy to bomb another country. QUOTE but see.. the diff is that they have to somehow sneak their way in and we can stop them with security measures.. the Japanese had little chance to stop the two bombs. they didnt have any chance to rebuild any defenses of sorts after the first bomb was dropped oh, but you see. the japanese could have stopped the bombs. all they had to do was shoot down the bomber. the bomb wasn't even armed before about 2 hours before bombs away. one bomber hiroshima didn't have an air base. it was a military support area, not an are base. the japanesse were not idmediatly wounded. it was a long term wound, to prevent the japanesse from manufacturing supplies. thier air defenses were quite adequete, i tell you. |
|
|
![]() ![]() |