gay marriages, UHHHH!! |
Here are the general forum rules that you must follow before you start any debate topics. Please make sure you've read and followed all directions.
gay marriages, UHHHH!! |
![]()
Post
#1
|
|
Group: Posts: 0 Joined: -- Member No: 0 ![]() |
ok, im not opposed to it because:
1. if they're getting married how is that affecting me. 2. When gay ppl "do it", they cant umm..."have it" (i think so newayz), and that'll keep the constantly increasing population of the world down. thats all i can think of right now, did u know, just like until a couple of months ago i was VERY opposed to gays, it just sickened me, but ive changed my thinking (no i have NOT become gay) |
|
|
![]() |
![]()
Post
#2
|
|
![]() Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Member Posts: 507 Joined: Jan 2004 Member No: 832 ![]() |
QUOTE it should if enough people support the idea and the senators represent that idea. omg no it shouldn't. that's going against everything this nation is founded on. You can't mix religion and government. And 1/6 isn't a majority. I QUOTE gay people deserve tax breaks. people who aren't qualified for them don't deserve them. So you agree they deserve tax breaks. If you remove religious or cultural context away from marriage, that's all it basically is. Tax breaks for couples that are committed to each other. QUOTE it can be taught. and if the child listens and accepts the idea then they will be homosexual too. You are incorrect, current consensus is that homosexuality is biological rather than social. Just because parents teach that homosexuality is ok does not mean the kids will be homosexual. If anything the kids of homosexual parents will be much more open minded to the life styles of other people. I very much doubt homosexual parents are close minded enough to force their kdis into homosexuality, which is more than i can say for heterosexual parents. http://www.psych.utoronto.ca/~joordens/cou...er13/sld019.htm I guess theres no point in quoting your 'end of human race' idea because the above addresses it. |
|
|
![]() ![]() |