socialism v. capitalism: |
Here are the general forum rules that you must follow before you start any debate topics. Please make sure you've read and followed all directions.
socialism v. capitalism: |
![]()
Post
#1
|
|
![]() in the reverb chamber. ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Staff Alumni Posts: 4,022 Joined: Nov 2005 Member No: 300,308 ![]() |
i view capitalism as a mode of economic & social infancy. i think that it is regressive to society, poisonous, & under-developing.
i point to these basic "flaws" in capitalism*: 1. the emphasis on profit as opposed to utility. 2. the creation of oligarchy & plutocracy. 3. the unfair/uneven distribution of wealth. 4. the creation of a significant class divide. 5. the inability of capitalism, alone, to provide the people with necessities. 6. the exploitation of the working class. 7. the existence of crime in excess, caused by class struggle, poverty, & proletariat anxiety. 8. the creation of an oppressive institution (i.e. the police state, the church, the education system) in order to secure profits to a specific & elite population. i point to these basic "benefits" in socialism*: 1. the emphasis on utility. 2. the destruction of plutocracy & (in many forms) oligarchy. 3. the fair distribution of wealth. 4. the destruction of a significant class divide. 5. the ability of socialism to provide for its people, necessities. 6. the affirmation of the working class. 7. the absence of crime invoked by squalor & proletariat anxiety. 8. the destruction of specific oppressive institutions & the opportunity to reform the state (i.e. despite the pull of capital & profits). DISCUSS. *quotation marks provided for argument's sake. whatever. |
|
|
![]() |
![]()
Post
#2
|
|
![]() in the reverb chamber. ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Staff Alumni Posts: 4,022 Joined: Nov 2005 Member No: 300,308 ![]() |
Just about 90% of the things you said about me were wrong. who cares? if you're out of poverty now, you're an exception to the rule. what's your point? most of what i said is not only still valid... it's convincing. not to mention, you sound like a f*cking bourgeois sociopath. what the hell else am i supposed to think when someone says shit like, "anyone can succeed! the american dream is alive in the ghetto!" |
|
|
![]()
Post
#3
|
|
![]() Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Official Member Posts: 1,574 Joined: Aug 2007 Member No: 555,438 ![]() |
if you're out of poverty now, you're an exception to the rule. Just like the poor individuals who's lives have just completely f*cked them over are an exception to my own. I'm not saying Capitalism is perfect Nate. People do fall through the holes, however socialism would need to be restructured before I was ever able to accept it. I see people in my shitty slum of a neighborhood living off the government all the time. These are people who could and should contribute to society by having a job of some sort, but they don't look for a job because the gov't gives them far more than what it nessesary to survive. Instead they stop taking care of themselves and rely on the goverment to bail them out of their incompitance. It's downright unfair to the working class. So why capitalism? Does capitalism work any better when combined with the human element? Is capitalism any less corrupt? Because it's not controlled by anyone one thing, and it's monitored to keep it that way. The bottom line, there is no single point of failure. Socialism, while it paves the way for everyone, it rewards those who are lazy slobs with no ambition to succeed. There is plenty of opportunity for people to succeed in this country under capitalism. While there are exceptions to to anything and capitalism isn't without flaws. It's been successful for the past century. Why should we change it? While I'm sure you could point out several reasons this country was founded on capitalism and became the greatest country in the world because of it. The pros for capitalism far outweigh the cons. Take health care for example, while everyone seems to insist on pushing nationalized health care they don't see effect of doing so. Doctors who see patients in a nationalized health care system are paid the same regardless of quality of service. Incentive to become a better doctor is stifled. Patients receive service that is not as good, development of medical research is slowed down as a result of reduced private funding, etc... When you take "competition" out of an industry it becomes less productive, and in this case more people inevitably die as a result. |
|
|
![]()
Post
#4
|
|
![]() Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Official Member Posts: 5,166 Joined: Oct 2007 Member No: 585,858 ![]() |
Just like the poor individuals who's lives have just completely f*cked them over are an exception to my own. I'm not saying Capitalism is perfect Nate. People do fall through the holes, however socialism would need to be restructured before I was ever able to accept it. I see people in my shitty slum of a neighborhood living off the government all the time. These are people who could and should contribute to society by having a job of some sort, but they don't look for a job because the gov't gives them far more than what it nessesary to survive. Instead they stop taking care of themselves and rely on the goverment to bail them out of their incompitance. It's downright unfair to the working class.Because it's not controlled by anyone one thing, and it's monitored to keep it that way. The bottom line, there is no single point of failure. Socialism, while it paves the way for everyone, it rewards those who are lazy slobs with no ambition to succeed. There is plenty of opportunity for people to succeed in this country under capitalism. While there are exceptions to to anything and capitalism isn't without flaws. It's been successful for the past century. Why should we change it? While I'm sure you could point out several reasons this country was founded on capitalism and became the greatest country in the world because of it. The pros for capitalism far outweigh the cons. Take health care for example, while everyone seems to insist on pushing nationalized health care they don't see effect of doing so. Doctors who see patients in a nationalized health care system are paid the same regardless of quality of service. Incentive to become a better doctor is stifled. Patients receive service that is not as good, development of medical research is slowed down as a result of reduced private funding, etc... When you take "competition" out of an industry it becomes less productive, and in this case more people inevitably die as a result. not aalll ppl lyke dat foo.. |
|
|
![]()
Post
#5
|
|
![]() Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Official Member Posts: 1,574 Joined: Aug 2007 Member No: 555,438 ![]() |
not aalll ppl lyke dat foo.. Everyone knows not all people are like that. Next time, read what's been said before you comment. QUOTE I see people in my shitty slum of a neighborhood living off the government all the time. Those are the people I'm referring to; not all people. |
|
|
![]()
Post
#6
|
|
![]() Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Official Member Posts: 5,166 Joined: Oct 2007 Member No: 585,858 ![]() |
^i got this.. WATCH
![]() ![]() Everyone knows not all people are like that. Next time, read what's been said before you comment. Those are the people I'm referring to; not all people. you ever thought the ppl living in the slum not all bums? COM ON BEECH... aintt gitt alll daii.. LIT GO.. ![]() |
|
|
![]()
Post
#7
|
|
![]() Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Official Member Posts: 1,574 Joined: Aug 2007 Member No: 555,438 ![]() |
Again, you need to read.
|
|
|
![]() ![]() |