Teen Faces Porn Charges for Nude MySpace Pictures, Another one bites the dust! Options

[illriginal]

A 14 year old New Jersey girl has been accused of child pornography after posting over 30 explicit nude pictures of herself on MySpace.com, charges that could force her to register as a sex offender if convicted.

Video: http://webcastr.com/videos/underground/tee...e-pictures.html


You'd think that children would just learn their lessons by now.

Oh by the way, I'm one of those people on Myspace who actually does report people for nudity of any form.

[brooklyneast05]

i didn't have an issue with the word possession that i know of, so i duno what the point of that is. our disagreement was more over what falls under legal and illegal to possess, not what constitutes possession really. you insisted having the images was porn and against the law (as i quoted you saying), and then you quoted laws that stated it wasn't since sexual conduct wasn't depicted.

the rest of your post is whatever to me. it doesn't address what i just posted anyway so there isn't much to say to it. what i just posted was quoting your numerous posts that didn't make sense together and you didn't address any of those. you don't need to bother becuase i think half of your contradicting posts are because you're being broad in some and more specific in others and it's confusing people, which just happens.

we don't even disagree that there should be consequences to what she did.

[illriginal]

i didn't have an issue with the word possession that i know of, so i duno what the point of that is. our disagreement was more over what falls under legal and illegal to possess, not what constitutes possession really. you insisted having the images was porn and against the law (as i quoted you saying), and then you quoted laws that stated it wasn't since sexual conduct wasn't depicted.

the rest of your post is whatever to me. it doesn't address what i just posted anyway so there isn't much to say to it. what i just posted was quoting your numerous posts that didn't make sense together and you didn't address any of those. you don't need to bother becuase i think half of your contradicting posts are because you're being broad in some and more specific in others and it's confusing people, which just happens.

we don't even disagree that there should be consequences to what she did.

Ya I've read the posts and it's going from this specific case to just in general then back to this specific case again... which makes things really difficult in regards to understanding the law.