Teen Faces Porn Charges for Nude MySpace Pictures, Another one bites the dust! Options

[illriginal]

A 14 year old New Jersey girl has been accused of child pornography after posting over 30 explicit nude pictures of herself on MySpace.com, charges that could force her to register as a sex offender if convicted.

Video: http://webcastr.com/videos/underground/tee...e-pictures.html


You'd think that children would just learn their lessons by now.

Oh by the way, I'm one of those people on Myspace who actually does report people for nudity of any form.

[karmakiller]

She should be charged for possessing her own body?

I'm saying that you make no f*cking sense as to why she would be charged with possessing her own naked photos. If I were to take a naked photo of myself why should I be charged with possession? That's like saying that I can't look at myself naked in the mirror.

She didn't take the photos with the intentions of posting them all over the internet. And she didn't take the photos with intentions of dirty men jacking off to them. As you said...

There's intentions behind it... it is the intentions that put on the scale.

Under your theory the boyfriend should be charged with looking at his own girlfriend naked and the girl should be charged with looking at herself, lol. Do you see how ridiculous that sounds?

[illriginal]

She should be charged for possessing her own body?

I'm saying that you make no f*cking sense as to why she would be charged with possessing her own naked photos. If I were to take a naked photo of myself why should I be charged with possession? That's like saying that I can't look at myself naked in the mirror.

She didn't take the photos with the intentions of posting them all over the internet. And she didn't take the photos with intentions of dirty men jacking off to them. As you said...

Under your theory the boyfriend should be charged with looking at his own girlfriend naked and the girl should be charged with looking at herself, lol. Do you see how ridiculous that sounds?

Don't look at me, I didn't create the law. Speak to your congress or senator about it. I'm tryin to tell you how it is on the law side of things.

She can possess the picture but in privacy, in her own home, legally. But as soon as she walks outside with that naked photo, whether it's literally a picture in her hand or on her digital cam, or on her cell phone... or even her lap top she's now in possession of illegal material.

This works the same exact way with the internet. Once you connect to the internet and you upload what you possess which is illegal material, you're now in possession. If you distribute that illegal material via download link or link that directly sends the viewer to your pictures then you can be charged with not only possession but also distribution.

Again.. in regards to possession (illegal material) it is only called that term when the illegal material is outside the boundaries of privacy.

As for the boyfriend, yes he should be charged as well, IF he requested those pictures. If she makes a statement saying that she took the pictures because her boyfriend asked her too, then yes lol.... he's f*cked. And if that in fact is the case, then she would face a less severe punishment while the boyfriend gets hit even harder. But in order for that case to be proven she would need to show proof. Instant Messages, Email, Myspace Messages, voice mail, text message.. you get the point. Otherwise it's her word against his.


What I'm laughing at right now is the fact you claim:

She didn't take the photos with the intentions of posting them all over the internet.

You're right... her mouse took control of her computer, logged her computer into Myspace, navigated to the "upload" link, and uploaded 30 images. All of this happened after she took 30 pictures of her naked body.


And it's 30 pictures? I'm sure it's 30 different poses... sexual poses. Sexually explicit poses. Your argument is f*ckin trash... I can't believe you're even debating this.. or even tryin to defend this girl.