Teen Faces Porn Charges for Nude MySpace Pictures, Another one bites the dust! Options

[illriginal]

A 14 year old New Jersey girl has been accused of child pornography after posting over 30 explicit nude pictures of herself on MySpace.com, charges that could force her to register as a sex offender if convicted.

Video: http://webcastr.com/videos/underground/tee...e-pictures.html


You'd think that children would just learn their lessons by now.

Oh by the way, I'm one of those people on Myspace who actually does report people for nudity of any form.

[Tung]

so are you saying she shouldn't be allow to look at herself naked when she's in the showers? >______>

[illriginal]

so are you saying she shouldn't be allow to look at herself naked when she's in the showers? >______>

Wow... you're a f*ckin moron, Tung. No where, ever, in this thread did I say anything like that. If you're unsure about what people are talking about... just read.

i can't wait till the day we're more concerned with real criminals that actually hurt people.


loool.gif

I can't wait til Sharia Law comes... f*ck the change Obama's gonna bring, we'll show all of you what REAL change is.

[Tung]

Wow... you're a f*ckin moron, Tung. No where, ever, in this thread did I say anything like that. If you're unsure about what people are talking about... just read.

i know you didn't. but you brought up that she shouldn't be taking naked pictures of herself. who cares if these kids are taking naked photos of themselves. it's the same shit as looking at your self naked. maybe they want to take a naked picture of themselves for self adoration and look at themselves when they upload the photo on their computer. it's the same shit as you taking a photo of your damn "muscles" in your cb profile. for self adoration. what exactly is the harm of taking a naked photo of yourself? if it was to post it online to exploit and shit like jc said then it'll be different.

and the person who talked about nude photos and child pornography is correct. they are two different things. a photo of a nude 10 year old guy walking around in public isn't child pornography. it's a nudist photo, and doesn't show any sexual exploitation.

[illriginal]

i know you didn't. but you brought up that she shouldn't be taking naked pictures of herself. who cares if these kids are taking naked photos of themselves. it's the same shit as looking at your self naked. maybe they want to take a naked picture of themselves for self adoration and look at themselves when they upload the photo on their computer. it's the same shit as you taking a photo of your damn "muscles" in your cb profile. for self adoration. what exactly is the harm of taking a naked photo of yourself? if it was to post it online to exploit and shit like jc said then it'll be different.

and the person who talked about nude photos and child pornography is correct. they are two different things. a photo of a nude 10 year old guy walking around in public isn't child pornography. it's a nudist photo, and doesn't show any sexual exploitation.

If it aims to show their private parts... it's automatically labeled, "pornography". This has been known for ever.

And it's not the same as taking a picture of my "muscles". Because my damn arms aren't sexual organs. -.-

There's no harm in the action of taking a nude picture of yourself. It is the actions AFTERWARD that causes harm. What you will do with the picture is what weighs in the balance.