Teen Faces Porn Charges for Nude MySpace Pictures, Another one bites the dust! Options

[illriginal]

A 14 year old New Jersey girl has been accused of child pornography after posting over 30 explicit nude pictures of herself on MySpace.com, charges that could force her to register as a sex offender if convicted.

Video: http://webcastr.com/videos/underground/tee...e-pictures.html


You'd think that children would just learn their lessons by now.

Oh by the way, I'm one of those people on Myspace who actually does report people for nudity of any form.

[Tung]

You guys are all f*cken idiots. This only further proves how stupid US laws are. Come on? So are you telling me if a 13 year old girl takes naked pictures of herself, she'll get charged for child pornography possesion? It's her f*cken body. It's like telling underage kids not to look at their own bodies. f*ck the US government, and it's hypocritical self. You have no idea how much child prostitution and trafficking happens behind close doors in higher government.

[illriginal]

You guys are all f*cken idiots. This only further proves how stupid US laws are. Come on? So are you telling me if a 13 year old girl takes naked pictures of herself, she'll get charged for child pornography possesion? It's her f*cken body. It's like telling underage kids not to look at their own bodies. f*ck the US government, and it's hypocritical self. You have no idea how much child prostitution and trafficking happens behind close doors in higher government.

Technically it's not her body... her body belongs to her parents. She has no right to take pictures of her childish private parts just to expose them to someone else. If she was 18 and her boyfriend was 18, there would be no issue at all and the law would be wrong, but this isn't the case.

You're ass backwards, my man.

[Tung]

Technically it's not her body... her body belongs to her parents. She has no right to take pictures of her childish private parts just to expose them to someone else. If she was 18 and her boyfriend was 18, there would be no issue at all and the law would be wrong, but this isn't the case.

You're ass backwards, my man.

LOL @ her body belongs to her parents. idiot. f*ck outta here with that shit. i never said she wasn't at fault. she was at fault for posting nude pictures online. but the fact that she was charged with POSSESSION of child pornography is another thing im arguing. it's dumb as f*ck. i would understand if she got punished for distributing child pornography, but for possession? you kidding me? are you telling me if i had take naked pictures of myself 3 years ago (i would been 17 years old), i would have gotten punished for posession of child pornography? think about how ridiculous that is dipshit.

[illriginal]

LOL @ her body belongs to her parents. idiot. f*ck outta here with that shit. i never said she wasn't at fault. she was at fault for posting nude pictures online. but the fact that she was charged with POSSESSION of child pornography is another thing im arguing. it's dumb as f*ck. i would understand if she got punished for distributing child pornography, but for possession? you kidding me? are you telling me if i had take naked pictures of myself 3 years ago (i would been 17 years old), i would have gotten punished for posession of child pornography? think about how ridiculous that is dipshit.

Bro... replace the nude pictures with marijuana... same outcome. If the material or object is illegal, for the love of God, it makes complete sense to be charged with possession for having nude pictures of a person under the age of 18. Even your own. Laws exist to prevent things from happening... if you can't see that, then that's your problem.